Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
Mazda

8 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 125 hp
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual has by 32 % more horsepower in comparison to Ford Ecosport II. The Mazda will be distinctly better accelerate owing to grater horsepower. Also leaving behind other vehicles while driving should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.2 > 12.7 s
If a fast driving is what you enjoy, the Mazda is better for you because it’s acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is 28 % better compared to the Ford Ecosport II.
33

Top speed

200 > 180 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Mazda CX-5 is greater than of the Ford by 11, which allows the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual to travel faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 11 % is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,521 mm
The Mazda CX-5 has 7 percent longer wheelbase than Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. Thanks to this the Mazda CX-5 is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mazda has a one more speed in comparison to the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. Generally this additional gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous gears can be shorter to allow better acceleration in the lower gears. One more gear also will contribute to smaller fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,000 cc
The Mazda CX-5 has 998 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity in relation to the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. The difference is relatively substantia. As a result the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand larger cubic capacity usually results in worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

4,537 > 4,244 mm
The Mazda is 293 millimeters longer when compared to the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. Long cars are more spacious and also provide more storage space. While the Mazda seems to be better for families or persons who appreciate convenient driving, the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual may appeal to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 5.8 l
The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual uses 9 percent fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Mazda CX-5. The Ford Ecosport II, which is classified in „compact SUV” class uses by 2.2 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 7.3 l
The Ford Ecosport II uses 0.5 l less in the city when compared to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. The difference in the amount of 7 % is not very appreciable in daily usage of the automobile but within a few years it would allow you to make a real savings.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.1 l
22

Width

2,057 > 1,843 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford Ecosport II is 12 percent wider in comparison to the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
The difference in date of commencement of production between presented cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Ford Ecosport II may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,696 > 1,668 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 2 percent in favor of the Ford Ecosport II is little and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK