Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

9 reasons for

Mercedes GLA, model available from 2013.
It has 250 211HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
Mercedes

9 reasons for Mercedes GLA 250 211KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

211 > 125 hp
The Mercedes GLA comes with petrol which produce by 86 more horsepower than the the engine of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It seems to be googd choice to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.1 > 12.7 s
The Mercedes GLA speeds up to 100k\h by 44 % quicker than the Ford Ecosport II. A significant difference in acceleration in favor of the Mercedes GLA will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

230 > 180 km/h
The Ford has 28 percent smaller maximum velocity in comparison to the Mercedes, thanks to which covering a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference might be perceptible during travelling on on the road without speed limits to the car of Mercedes brand advantage.
15

Wheelbase

2,697 > 2,521 mm
The Mercedes has 176 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Ford. Thanks to this the Mercedes is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,991 > 1,000 cc
The Mercedes GLA has 991 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity than the Ford Ecosport II. The difference is considerable. Consequently the Mercedes GLA should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size means worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,417 > 4,244 mm
The Mercedes is 173 mm longer in comparison to the Ford Ecosport II. Long vehicles more of passenger space and in most cases have plenty of trunk space. While the Mercedes GLA seems to be better for families or persons who appreciate comfortable rides, the Ford Ecosport II may appeal to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To people who value less absorbing use of a car and who don’t want to struggle with complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. To those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox might be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 6.6 l
The Ford burns up 20 % fewer in the mixed cycle when compared to the Mercedes GLA. The difference in the amount of 20 % is not realy noticeable. However within some time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 8.3 l
The Ford uses 18 percent fewer in city traffic when compared to the Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4. The difference in the amount of 18 % is not realy noticeable in daily usage of the ride, however, in a several months it would allow you to make a real savings.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.4 l
22

Width

2,057 > 1,804 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Ford Ecosport II is widther by 253 mm compared with the Mercedes GLA and is not really relevant. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to 1,797 mm and is by 14 % smaller than the width of the Ford Ecosport II.
1

Height

1,696 > 1,493 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 14 percent in favor of the Ford Ecosport II is small and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Mercedes GLA 250 211HP automatic 4x4 Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,804 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK