Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting 1.8 150HP manual 4x4 vs Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting 1.8 150HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

8 reasons for

Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting, model available from 2010.
It has 1.8 150HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Ecosport II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
Mitsubishi

8 reasons for Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting 1.8 150KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 125 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting is 20 percent bigger in relation to the Ford. Because the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10 > 12.7 s
A little difference amounts to 21 percent indicates that the Ford Ecosport II is insensibly beaten here. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, to which the Ford is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 1.8 s faster than acceleration of Ford’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

198 > 180 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting is greater compared with of the Ford Ecosport II by 18 kilometers per hour, which allows the Mitsubishi to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 10 percent is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,676 > 2,521 mm
The wheelbase of a car equals the distance between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting has 6 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Ford Ecosport II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Mitsubishi have a higher gear count in relation to the Ford Ecosport II which means that Mitsubishi would have faster acceleration and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and if you are not drag racing at a timed event you would not observe the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,797 > 1,000 cc
The engine size of the Mitsubishi is by 797 cc larger when compared to the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual. For this reason the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Mitsubishi ASX will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,296 > 4,244 mm
The Mitsubishi ASX is 1 percent longer in comparison to the Ford. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the boot. The Mitsubishi ASX preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Mitsubishi will be better driven ,however, the Ford Ecosport II will be a slightly easier to park due to shorter length of the body.

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting 1.8 150HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.3 > 5.9 l
The Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual consumes 10 % fewer in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting. The difference in the amount of 10 percent is not perceptible. Nevertheless in the long term it would give a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 7 l
The Ford Ecosport II consumes 3 % less fuel running around the town in relation to the Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting. The Ford Ecosport II, that comes from compact SUV class, burns up 2.8 l fewer gasoline. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the compact SUV segment equals to 9.6 l, whereas the Ford Ecosport II consumes by 29 % less amount of fuel than the average.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 4.9 l
22

Width

2,057 > 1,770 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The width of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual is larger only by 16 percent than the Mitsubishi ASX and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact SUV” class equals to 1,797 millimeters and is by 260 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2010
The difference in release date between these two cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Ford Ecosport II may feature more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,696 > 1,615 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 5 % in favor of the Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual is little and does not matter much.

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi ASX SUV Facelifting 1.8 150HP manual 4x4 Ford Ecosport II 1.0 Ecoboost 125HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2010 2013
    Facelifting yes no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,059 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK