Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Ford Escape II, model available from 2007 to 2013.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual
Land Rover

15 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 155 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Land Rover which has by 85 more horsepower than the Ford Escape II. As a result the Land Rover Freelander II can reach higher velocity. Because of more horsepower the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 should as well give more flexiblility in specific speeds.
112

Average consumption

9.4 > 9.7 l
The Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 consumes 3 percent less in the mixed cycle than the Ford Escape II. The difference in the amount of 3 % is not very appreciable. Nevertheless in the long run it can generate a real savings.
59

Maximal torque

338 > 206 Nm
The Land Rover Freelander II has 64 percent more torque in relation to the Ford Escape II. Even though the vast majority of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it describes the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is relevant and for that reason the Land Rover will deliver you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.6 > 10.4 s
A small difference that amounts to 17 percent shows that the Ford Escape II is the worst car of these two . In the „mini 4x4 class, being represented by the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 5 percent lower than this of Ford vehicle.
33

Top speed

200 > 185 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Land Rover Freelander II is greater than of the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual by 8, which allows the Land Rover to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 8 % is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,250 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is produced distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. The engine of the Ford Escape II achieves its full efficiency at 4,250 revolutions per minute which is by 2,500 revolutions/minute worst result compared with the Land Rover Freelander II.
15

Wheelbase

2,655 > 2,629 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Land Rover Freelander II has 26 mm longer wheelbase distance in relation to Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Land Rover Freelander II should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,500 > 4,485 mm
The Land Rover Freelander II is 15 millimeters longer in relation to the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual. The length of the car is important in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Land Rover Freelander II will be better driven ,however, the Ford will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,625 > 1,531 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,740 > 1,730 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Land Rover Freelander II, which is by 10 mm higher than the Ford Escape II, would be appropriate pick for you. However, presented vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For drivers who opt for more functional use of a vehicle and don’t want complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend cars equipped with automatic transmission. For those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift might be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,608 > 1,549 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,473 kg

Ford

4 reasons for Ford Escape II 2.3 155KM manual in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

934 > 754 l
The Ford Escape II features 180 l bigger luggage compartment in relation to the Land Rover Freelander II. Such a difference is quite relevant so it will distinctly affect the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Ford has 489 l bigger trunk size than the average in its class. Bigger boot will be useful during family traveling as well as while daily driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,791 > 1,671 l
8

Engine capacity

2,262 > 1,998 cc
The Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual has 264 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity in relation to the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4. As the difference is little, the Ford Escape II should accelerate slightly faster, if other paramerters are does not play a role.
1

Model release date

2007 > 2006
Because of the fact that the Land Rover Freelander II's production began only 1 year prior to the Ford Escape II, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Ford might feature a bit more modern solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg -
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2007
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK