Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Ford Escape II, model available from 2007 to 2013.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

10 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Ford

11 reasons for Ford Escape II 2.3 155KM manual in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 115 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of us take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Ford Escape II that has by 40 more horsepower when compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. Consequently the Ford Escape II can achieve higher velocity. Thanks to more horsepower the Ford Escape II should as well give seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

206 > 190 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Escape II is 8 percent bigger than the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Because of this, the Ford Escape II will accelerate slightly better and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual will consume on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.4 > 11.3 s
A small difference that amounts to 0.9 s indicates that the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Nissan Qashqai II, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 0.4 s higher than this of Nissan vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

934 > 438 l
The trunk of the Ford is 496 liters larger compared to the Nissan Qashqai II. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual will be much more convenient. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can transport.
33

Top speed

185 > 183 km/h
The maximum velocity of the Ford Escape II is greater in comparison to this of the Nissan which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 1 percent is small and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
22

Width

1,840 > 1,800 mm
Width of a vehicle directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Ford is larger by 40 mm compared with the Nissan Qashqai II and is not really relevant. The medium for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 2 percent larger than the width of the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual.
19

Fuel tank

60 > 54 l
The Nissan is worst that the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Ford Escape II is able to hold by 11 percent more fuel in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II.
8

Engine capacity

2,262 > 1,198 cc
The Ford has 1,064 cc greater engine displacement than the Nissan Qashqai II. The difference is relatively notable. Consequently the Ford Escape II should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement equals worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,485 > 4,380 mm
The Ford Escape II is 105 mm longer in relation to the Nissan Qashqai II. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Ford will be better driven ,however, the Nissan will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Height

1,730 > 1,590 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 9 percent in favor of the Ford Escape II is little and does not matter much.
0

Curb weight

1,473 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

10 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 9.7 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Nissan's advantage. This vehicle burns 4.1 l less petrol in the combined cycle in comparison to the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Nissan Qashqai II is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Nissan Qashqai II consumes by 25 % less amount of fuel than the average.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 4,250 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rotations per minute at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. The engine of the Ford Escape II achieves its full efficiency at 4,250 revolutions/minute which is by 2,245 revolutions per minute lower compared with the Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual.
19

Range

982 > 629 km
15

Wheelbase

2,644 > 2,629 mm
Nissan Qashqai II has 15 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
4

Rear track

1,563 > 1,531 mm
1

Model release date

2014 > 2007
Production of the older vehicle started 7 years prior to its competitor hence it is reasonable to suppose that this car features significantly less modern parts used.
1

Tire width

215 > 205 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,800 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,549 mm
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Ford Escape II 2.3 155HP manual Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,199 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK