Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic vs Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Honda CR-V IV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4
Ford

12 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 155 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this case, it is the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic which has by 16 percent horsepower more in comparison to the Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4, which makes this car somewhat faster. Thanks to more horsepower the Ford will also give slightly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 192 Nm
Due to 57 Nm more torque, the engine of the Ford Escape III distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Honda CR-V IV. This, in turn, produces better a car's acceleration.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 590 l
With more trunk space the Ford Escape III will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull car compared with the Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Ford Escape III will be better choice because it is around 64 % larger than the boot of its rival.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,500 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of rotations at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is good to see a torque graph.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,820 mm
Width of a car affects room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Ford is widther by 21 mm in comparison to the Honda and is not really relevant. The average for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 2 percent smaller than the same feature of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic.
15

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,624 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to better car's weight distribution. Ford Escape III has 3 percent longer wheelbase distance than Honda. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Ford Escape III should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
9

Ground clearance

202 > 165 mm
Ground clearance is the minimum distance between the car underbody and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Ford which has 22 percent higher ground clearance in comparison to the Honda CR-V IV. This is why the Ford Escape III will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height equals a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the Ford.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,570 mm
The Ford is 852 mm longer in comparison to the Honda. Long cars more of passenger space and also provide bigger trunk. While the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic occurs to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
Because of the fact that the Honda CR-V IV was introduced only 1 year prior to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic, the distance in technology used in both vehicles shouldn’t be really big, however, the Ford Escape III might feature slightly more new solutions applied in it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox in the Ford in spite of having a few minuses offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city the driver is less tired. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,518 kg

Honda

9 reasons for Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.8 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4's advantage. This automobile burns 28 percent less fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Ford. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the mini 4x4 class, in which the Honda CR-V IV is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Honda consumes by 4 % more fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

9.4 > 12.4 l
The Honda burns up 24 percent of petrol less while driving inside city in relation to the Ford Escape III. The Honda, which comes from mini 4x4 class, burns up 0.2 l fewer petrol, which constitutes by 2 % lower fuel consumption in comparison to the average in the same segment. The difference in this category between these two cars is quite big, so note that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should pick up vehicles with similar characteristics.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.4 > 8.8 l
19

Range

763 > 528 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 56 l
The Ford Escape III is worst that the Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4 in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Honda CR-V IV is able to store by 5 % more fuel in relation to the Ford Escape III.
12

Urban range

617 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

892 > 648 km
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,597 cc
The Honda CR-V IV has 401 cc greater cubic capacity than the Ford Escape III. The difference is substantia. Consequently the Honda CR-V IV should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand greater cubic capacity means worst fuel economy.
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,095 > 2,082 mm

Cars specifications

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight - 1,700 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK