The horsepower is a this thing that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford that has by 15 horsepower more than the Mazda CX-5, which makes this car a bit quicker. Because of more horsepower the Ford will as well provide somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
Maximum torque of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is 40 Nm bigger than the Mazda. As a result, the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will consume on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
The boot of the Ford Escape III is 93 % more spacious than the Mazda CX-5. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Ford will be much more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
Maximal torque RPM
A wider range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is worth to check a torque graph.
The Ford Escape III is 885 millimeters longer than the Mazda CX-5. Long vehicles are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Ford seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable rides, the Mazda CX-5 may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
Model release date
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Ford Escape III, which is by 16 millimeters higher than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual, is better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
For a drive in the city, it is tempting to opt for an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may use around from 5 to 10% more than manuals.