Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic
Mazda

12 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual's advantage. This vehicle burns 5 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the compact SUV class, in which the Mazda CX-5 is classified, is 7.5 l while the Mazda CX-5 needs by 23 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 12.4 l
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual uses of 5.1 l fuel less running around the town compared to the Ford. The Mazda CX-5, as a representative of compact SUV class, uses of 2.3 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” class is 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.1 > 8.8 l
22

Width

1,843 > 1,841 mm
Width of a vehicle directly influences on room in the cabin and also stability on road. The width of the Mazda is larger by 2 mm in relation to the Ford and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 percent smaller than the same feature of the Mazda.
19

Range

933 > 528 km
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,690 mm
Mazda has 10 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

747 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,098 > 648 km
9

Ground clearance

209 > 202 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several relevant characteristics of a car. Ride height is very important for off-road vehicles though all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Mazda has 3 % larger clearance than the Ford Escape III. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Mazda CX-5 will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,597 cc
The Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual has 401 cubic centimeters greater engine size than the Ford Escape III. The difference is relatively large. As a result the Mazda CX-5 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement means worst fuel efficiency.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,565 mm
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,563 mm

Ford

10 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 165 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of car fans pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford that has by 15 horsepower more than the Mazda CX-5, which makes this car a bit quicker. Because of more horsepower the Ford will as well provide somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 209 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is 40 Nm bigger than the Mazda. As a result, the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will consume on average fever fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 503 l
The boot of the Ford Escape III is 93 % more spacious than the Mazda CX-5. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Ford will be much more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,500 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered affects an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is worth to check a torque graph.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,537 mm
The Ford Escape III is 885 millimeters longer than the Mazda CX-5. Long vehicles are more spacious and also have plenty of trunk space. Although the Ford seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable rides, the Mazda CX-5 may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
The difference in release date between these two vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,684 > 1,668 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Ford Escape III, which is by 16 millimeters higher than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual, is better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a drive in the city, it is tempting to opt for an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may use around from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,420 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 1,803 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK