Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic vs Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP ic diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic
Mazda

15 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150KM automat in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 10.8 l
The Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic consumes 5.7 l less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Ford Escape III. The difference in the amount of 5.7 l is quite appreciable and buying the Mazda CX-5 results in saving a considerable amount of money. Moreover, fuel efficiency helps to release less pollution emissions.
59

Maximal torque

379 > 249 Nm
Because of 52 % greater torque, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Ford Escape III. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 12.4 l
The Mazda CX-5 uses 6.4 l less fuel in the city than the Ford. The difference at the level of 6.4 l will be quite big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, during long period of time it may generate gigantic cost savings. Also bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably increased if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,805 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 8.8 l
22

Width

1,843 > 1,841 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic is widther by 2 millimeters in comparison to the Ford Escape III and is not really relevant. The average for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 46 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Mazda CX-5.
19

Range

1,057 > 528 km
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,690 mm
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic has 10 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
12

Urban range

903 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,191 > 648 km
9

Ground clearance

209 > 202 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the gap between the vehicle underbody and the road. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Mazda CX-5 that has 3 percent higher ride height in relation to the Ford. For this reason the Mazda CX-5 will deal better in difficult terrain and obstacles in the city. There is olso one minus - the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the car.
8

Engine capacity

2,191 > 1,597 cc
The Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic has 594 cubic centimeters greater engine displacement when compared to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. The difference is big. For this reason the Mazda should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size usually affects worst fuel efficiency.
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,565 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,563 mm

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Ford Escape III is by 30 horsepowers bigger than the Mazda. Because the difference is little it should not affect the car performance largely.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 503 l
The boot of the Ford is 466 l larger in comparison to the Mazda. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford will be much more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can transport.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,537 mm
The Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is 20 % longer when compared to the Mazda CX-5. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have bigger trunk. Although the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic occurs to be better option for families or persons who value soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mazda CX-5 may be more appropriate to women as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Because of the fact that the Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic's production began only 2 years earlier than the Ford Escape III, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Ford Escape III may feature a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Height

1,684 > 1,668 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of big size, the Ford Escape III, which is by 16 mm higher than the Mazda, would be better choice for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,555 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150HP automatic Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK