Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic vs Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Nissan Qashqai II, model available from 2014.
It has 1.2 DIG-T 115HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
Ford

12 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 115 hp
The Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is equipped with petrol which produce by 57 percent more horsepower over the the engine of the Nissan Qashqai II, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It should be better car to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 190 Nm
Because of 31 percent greater torque, the engine of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Nissan. This, in turn, produces better acceleration.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 438 l
The trunk of the Ford Escape III is 531 l more spacious in relation to the Nissan. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Escape III will be a way more handy. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can load.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,800 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Ford Escape III is 41 millimeters wider in comparison to the Nissan Qashqai II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 54 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Ford which can carry 2 l more fuel compared with the Nissan Qashqai II. The average fuel tank capacity in the mini 4x4 class, from which the Ford comes from, equals 61 liters, whereas in small off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Nissan) it is 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,644 mm
The Ford Escape III has 2 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual. Consequently the Ford Escape III is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,198 cc
The engine size of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is by 399 cubic centimeters greater in comparison to the Nissan. In a consequence the Nissan Qashqai II will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Ford will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,380 mm
The Ford Escape III is 24 percent longer in comparison to the Nissan. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Ford will be better driven ,however, the Nissan Qashqai II will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,563 mm
1

Height

1,684 > 1,590 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of thinks to it. The difference of 6 % to the advantage of the Ford is insignificant and does not matter much.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For people who opt for more convenient driving a car and don’t need complications resulting from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles with automatic gearbox. To those who have a flair for sport driving a stick shift might be better because it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,314 kg

Nissan

10 reasons for Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115KM manual in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Qashqai II's advantage. This automobile uses 5.2 l less fuel in the mixed cycle compared to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the mini 4x4 class, in which the Nissan Qashqai II is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Nissan Qashqai II uses by 25 percent less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.9 > 12.4 l
The Nissan Qashqai II consumes 44 percent less fuel in the city than the Ford. The difference at the level of 44 % is quite big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, within years it will generate huge savings. Moreover you shoule take int consideration that presented results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably increased if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,005 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is delivered indicates how fast an engine achieves its best output with increase in revolutions. The lower rmp or the wider range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 8.8 l
19

Range

982 > 528 km
12

Urban range

797 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,122 > 648 km
1

Model release date

2014 > 2013
Given that the Ford Escape III started to be manufactured only 1 year earlier than the Nissan, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Nissan Qashqai II might have slightly more new solutions applied in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,564 > 1,563 mm

Cars specifications

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic Nissan Qashqai II 1.2 DIG-T 115HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,199 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2014
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK