Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
Ford

16 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 90 hp
The Ford Escape III has 100 % more horsepower compared to Renault. The Ford Escape III will be distinctly quicker speed up because of bigger horsepower. Also getting ahead of other vehicles while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 135 Nm
Because of 84 percent more torque, the engine of the Ford Escape III does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Renault. This, in turn, have relevant effects on acceleration.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 377 l
The boot of the Ford is 157 percent bigger in relation to the Renault Captur. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Ford Escape III will be a way more useful. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,778 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford Escape III is 4 percent wider than the Renault. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 46 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic which can carry 22 percent more fuel compared with the Renault. The medium fuel tank capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, from which the Ford Escape III comes from, amounts to 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Renault Captur) it equals 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,601 mm
Ford Escape III has 89 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Ford Escape III have a higher speed count in comparison to the Renault Captur which means that Ford Escape III should achieve better speeding up and lesser fuel consumption. But the difference is not big and unless you are drag racing at a timed event you would not even notice the difference.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 899 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Ford is by 698 cc larger than the Renault Captur. As a result the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Ford will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,122 mm
The Ford is longer in relation to the Renault Captur by 32 percent and it gives to its passengers much more room in the cabin or more roomy boot. In the „mini 4x4” segment, to which the car of brand Ford is assigned, the average length is of 4,341 mm and is by 25 % greater than the length of the Ford.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,514 mm
1

Height

1,684 > 1,566 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of loading big amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 8 % in favor of the Ford Escape III is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a travelling in the city, it is good to have an automatic but the choice of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel economy. Automatics may consume about from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,100 kg

Renault

7 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy of the Ford looks quite low compared with the Renault Captur. The difference at the level of 5.7 l makes the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual wiser pick in terms of high prices of fuel at petrol stations.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 12.4 l
The Renault Captur burns up of 6.4 l petrol fewer in the urban cycle in relation to the Ford. The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual, as a representative of mini 4x4 segment, uses 3.6 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment is 9.6 l per 100 km.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 8.8 l
19

Range

918 > 528 km
12

Urban range

750 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,047 > 648 km
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 5,700 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,662 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK