Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic vs Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy dCi 90HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
Ford

16 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. As far as the two compared cars are concerned, it is the Ford Escape III, which has by 100 % more horsepower than the Renault Captur, which makes this car a lot of better in terms of top speed. Due to more horsepower the Ford Escape III should also provide considerably more flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 220 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Escape III is 13 % greater than the Renault Captur. For this reason, the Ford will accelerate slightly faster and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also cause that the Ford will consume on average less fuel per 100 kilometers.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 377 l
The boot of the Ford Escape III is 592 l bigger compared to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will be a way more functional. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can hold.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,778 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ford Escape III is 63 mm wider when compared to the Renault Captur. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 46 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank size is Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic that is able to take by 22 percent more petrol compared with the Renault Captur.
15

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,601 mm
Ford Escape III has 3 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Ford Escape III has only one more speed compared to the Renault. Sometimes this additional gear is a very tall one so that the previous gears can be shorter to allow increased acceleration in the lower gears. One more speed as well helps to lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,462 cc
The Ford Escape III has by 135 cubic centimeters larger engine size when compared to the Renault. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both values are quite simmilar.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,122 mm
The Renault is shorter in comparison to the Renault Captur by o 32 %, which makes that it is much more easier to maneuver in narrow jammed cities. In the „small off-road 4x4” segment, in which the car of Renault manufacturer is palced, the average length equals to 4,341 millimeters and is by 219 millimeters longer than the length of Renault Captur.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,514 mm
1

Height

1,684 > 1,566 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Ford, which is by 118 mm higher than the Renault Captur, would be appropriate pick for you. However, compared cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission installed in the Ford Escape III in spite of having a few drawback offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be more rested. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,169 kg

Renault

8 reasons for Renault Captur Energy dCi 90KM manual in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

3.8 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy of the Ford Escape III is quite poor in relation to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. The difference at the level of 7 liters makes the Renault Captur wiser pick if you want to save money in times of rising prices of fuel at petrol stations.
56

Urban consumption

4.2 > 12.4 l
The Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual burns up 66 % less fuel in urban cycle compared with the Ford Escape III. The difference at the level of 66 percent will be very big in daily using car. Additionally, during years it will generate huge savings. Moreover bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably increased if you ride dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is delivered indicates how fast an engine reaches its best performance with growth in revolutions. The lower rotational speed or the longer range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.4 > 8.8 l
19

Range

1,250 > 528 km
12

Urban range

1,071 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,324 > 648 km
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,700 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,733 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK