Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic vs Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has TCe EDC 120HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic
Ford

12 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

180 > 120 hp
The Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is equipped with petrol which produce by 50 % more horsepower than the the engine of the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic, giving the vehicle a much more dynamic character. It should be better choice for drivers who would like to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

249 > 190 Nm
The Ford Escape III has 31 % more torque in relation to the Renault Captur. Even though a large number of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it presents the best how a car acclerates. In this case the difference is substantial thus the Ford Escape III will deliver you better feeling of driving.
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 377 l
The trunk of the Ford Escape III is 157 percent more spacious compared to the Renault Captur. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will be much more functional. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can hold.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,778 mm
Width of a car affects room in the cabin as well as stability while driving. The Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is widther only by 4 % than the Renault and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „mini 4x4” class equals to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 44 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Ford Escape III.
19

Fuel tank

56 > 46 l
The Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic loses with the Ford in the category of fuel tank size. The Ford Escape III is able to hold by 10 l more fuel than its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,601 mm
Ford Escape III has 89 mm longer wheelbase than the Renault. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,198 cc
The engine size of the Ford is by 399 cubic centimeters bigger in relation to the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic. In a consequence the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Ford will be of better quality, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,122 mm
The Ford Escape III is longer in comparison to the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic by 1,300 mm and it offers to its passengers much more room for legs inside the vehicle as well as it has more capable trunk. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, to which the car of manufacturer Ford is assigned, the average length is of 4,341 millimeters and is by 25 % greater than the length of the Ford Escape III.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,514 mm
1

Height

1,684 > 1,566 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 8 percent in favor of the Ford is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,529 mm
0

Curb weight

1,584 > 1,179 kg

Renault

8 reasons for Renault Captur TCe EDC 120KM automat in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Renault's advantage. This car uses 48 % fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared with the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. Note that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Renault Captur is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Renault Captur consumes by 25 % less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.6 > 12.4 l
The fuel consumption in city traffic is considerably to the Renault Captur's advantage. This car uses 5.8 l fewer fuel in built up area when compared to the Ford Escape III. Better fuel consumption means less fuel cost passed on you.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached determines an engine’s performance. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is worth to check a torque performance graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 8.8 l
19

Range

833 > 528 km
12

Urban range

682 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

957 > 648 km
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 5,700 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,730 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK