Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

15 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Escape III, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic
Subaru

15 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 180 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of drivers take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Subaru which has by 33 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. As a result the Subaru Forester IV will reach higher velocity. Due to more horsepower the Subaru should as well give noticeably more flexiblility in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 10.8 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Subaru's advantage. This vehicle burns 2.5 l less petrol in the mixed cycle compared to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the mini 4x4 class, in which the Subaru Forester IV is classified, is 7.5 l whereas the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 consumes by 11 percent more fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 249 Nm
The Subaru Forester IV has 101 newton meters more torque than the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Subaru Forester IV will accelerate significantly better.
56

Urban consumption

11.2 > 12.4 l
The fuel consumption of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is 1.2 l lower when compared to the Ford Escape III. Despite the fact that the difference is little, in the long run it may cause that the vehicle would be noticably cheper to use.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,400 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is reached tells us how fast an engine reaches its full output with growth in rmp. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt faster.
24

Extra-urban consumption

7 > 8.8 l
19

Range

706 > 528 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 56 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Subaru Forester IV that can comprise 9 % more fuel in relation to the Ford. The average fuel tank size in the compact SUV segment, which is represented by the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4, equals 61 l, whereas in small off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Ford Escape III) it equals 61 l.
12

Urban range

536 > 467 km
11

Extra-urban range

857 > 648 km
9

Ground clearance

220 > 202 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the minimum distance between the car body and the road. As far as the two compared vehicles are concerned, it is the Subaru which has 9 % higher ground clearance in relation to the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic. This is why the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will deal better when driving over imperfect roads and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the car.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,597 cc
The engine capacity of the Subaru Forester IV is by 25 % bigger when compared to the Ford Escape III. For this reason the Ford will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will be of better quality, running more smoothly and more durable.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine placed inside the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 occurs to be noticeably better because it is smaller and produces less vibrations compared to engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line. Furthermore it is worth knowing its flat design results in that a vehicle has a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one inside the Ford Escape III, is that because of its simple construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,584 kg

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180KM automat in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

969 > 505 l
The trunk of the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is 92 % more spacious in relation to the Subaru Forester IV. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic will be much more functional. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
22

Width

1,841 > 1,795 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Ford Escape III is widther only by 3 % than the Subaru and is not really important. The medium for the „mini 4x4” segment amounts to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 2 percent smaller than the same feature of the Ford Escape III.
15

Wheelbase

2,690 > 2,634 mm
The Ford has 56 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Subaru Forester IV. As a result the Ford Escape III is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable riding.
6

Length

5,422 > 4,596 mm
The Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic is 18 % longer when compared to the Subaru Forester IV. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Ford probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Ford Escape III will be better driven but the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will be a slightly easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,547 mm
0

Front track

1,563 > 1,545 mm

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Ford Escape III 1.6 EcoBoost 180HP automatic
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK