Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic vs Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

22 reasons for

Ford Excursion, model available from 2000 to 2005.
It has 5.4 258HP ic petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2005.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mazda Tribute I, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
Ford

22 reasons for Ford Excursion 5.4 258KM automat in comparison to Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

258 > 124 hp
The Ford Excursion has by 108 % bigger amount of horses under the hood in comparison to the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. The difference is really big and because of this it greatly affect feeling of using the car. It may be interesting to know that the Ford Excursion has by 43 horsepowers more horsepower compared to the medium level in its class.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.8 > 13.7 s
A little difference at the level of 7 percent indicates that the Mazda Tribute I is insignificantly beaten in this confrontation. In the „large 4x4 ” class, to which the Mazda Tribute I is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 30 % faster than acceleration of Mazda’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

1,359 > 368 l
The trunk of the Ford Excursion is 991 liters more spacious than the Mazda Tribute I. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Excursion will be much more convenient. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

4,145 > 2,247 l
33

Top speed

185 > 166 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Ford is greater in comparison to this of the Mazda by 11, which allows the Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 11 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

2,032 > 1,795 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The width of the Ford is larger only by 13 percent compared with the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 and is not really relevant. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” class amounts to 1,866 mm and is by 166 millimeters larger than the same feature of the Ford.
19

Range

814 > 588 km
19

Fuel tank

165 > 57 l
The Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic has by 108 liters larger fuel container than the Mazda. Consequently the Ford Excursion will drive distinctly longer distance without need of refueling, of course assuming that the fuel consumption is the same between these two cars.
15

Wheelbase

3,480 > 2,622 mm
The Ford has 858 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4. The shorter wheelbase, the less time exists for shock absorption by the separate suspension components. Thus the Ford Excursion with a longer wheelbase may give the smoothest travel. But, the Mazda with shorter wheelbases have tighter turning angles and can corner faster than equivalent cars with long wheelbases.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
8

Engine capacity

5,399 > 1,989 cc
The Ford Excursion has 3,410 cubic centimeters greater engine capacity in relation to the Mazda Tribute I. Such a big difference causes that comparision of this characteristics is aimless. The Mazda Tribute I seems to be the good choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and vehicle running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, drivers the Ford should benefit from better power, flexibility, smoothness of the car and as a consequence more fun when driving.
6

Length

5,758 > 4,395 mm
The Ford Excursion is longer in relation to the Mazda Tribute I by 31 percent and it offers to passengers much more room for legs in the cabin as well as it has more roomy trunk. In the „large 4x4 ” segment, to which the car of manufacturer Ford is assigned, the average length amouts to 4,713 mm and is by 1,045 millimeters greater than the length of the Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic.
4

Rear track

1,730 > 1,550 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better construction of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which as far as we are concerned is {a better one. Engine of V characteristic in a vehicle the Ford Excursion gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime can contain more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans to a V engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

265 > 215 mm
1

Height

1,948 > 1,710 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Ford, which is by 238 mm higher than the Mazda Tribute I, would be better pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel efficiency. Automatics may consume around from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,500 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,261 > 1,986 kg
0

Front track

1,735 > 1,553 mm
0

Curb weight

3,125 > 1,490 kg

Mazda

4 reasons for Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.5 > 20.4 l
In comparison to the Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic, the fuel economy of Mazda seems to be really impressive. The Mazda Tribute I burns up 10.9 L/100Km less fuel in relation to the Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2005
0

Tire profile

70 > 75 %

Cars specifications

Ford Excursion 5.4 258HP automatic Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,261 kg 1,986 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK