Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

15 reasons for

Ford Expedition I, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2003.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Ford

15 reasons for Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218KM automat in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
138

Maximal power

218 > 170 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans take into consideration at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic which has by 48 more horsepower in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. As a result the Ford Expedition I can reach higher top speed. Having more horsepower the Ford Expedition I should also give noticeably more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

393 > 253 Nm
Thanks to 55 % higher torque, the engine of the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. This, in turn, have positive implications for acceleration.
47

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12 > 12.8 s
A small difference at the level of 6 percent suggests that the Mitsubishi is the worst vehicle of these two presented. In the „full-size SUV class, being represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, the medium acceleration to 100km/h amounts to 10.5 s and is by 2.3 s higher than this of Mitsubishi car.
29

Maximal torque RPM

3,250 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the highest torque is reached tells us how fast an engine achieves its best output with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the longer range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
28

Top speed

179 > 175 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Ford Expedition I is greater in comparison to this of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 4 kilometers per hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily use.
20

Width

1,996 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic is 18 percent wider than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
16

Wheelbase

3,019 > 2,725 mm
The Ford Expedition I has 11 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Thanks to this the Ford is safer and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Cylinders

8 > 6
9

Length

5,201 > 4,610 mm
The Ford Expedition I is 591 mm longer when compared to the Mitsubishi. Long vehicles have more interior space and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who appreciate convenient rides, the Mitsubishi may be more appropriate to women as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Engine capacity

4,602 > 2,971 cc
The Ford Expedition I has 55 % larger cubic capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The difference is relatively large. As a result the Ford Expedition I should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine displacement usually equals worst fuel economy.
3

Rear track

1,666 > 1,434 mm
2

Height

1,887 > 1,720 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 167 mm in favor of the Ford is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,400 > 5,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,661 > 1,422 mm
0

Curb weight

2,200 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

4 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

13.5 > 18 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 uses 25 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle when compared to the Ford Expedition I. The difference at the level of 4.5 l will be realy noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long term it will bring you a considerable reduction of costs.
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2003

Cars specifications

Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Model release date 1996 1996
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    End of model sale 2003 2008
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK