The Ford is equipped with petrol which produce by 94 more horsepower over the the engine of the Nissan Terrano II, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be better option for drivers who want to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference in the amount of 9 % indicates that the Nissan is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „full-size SUV segment, being represented by the Nissan Terrano II, the medium acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 2.7 s higher than this of Nissan vehicle.
The trunk of the Ford Expedition I is 1,610 l more spacious in comparison to the Nissan. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic will be much more handy. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can load.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The maximum velocity of the Ford is greater than this of the Nissan by 19 kilometers per hour, which allows the Ford Expedition I to travel faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 19 kilometers/hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic is 14 % wider when compared to the Nissan Terrano II. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Nissan Terrano II loses with the Ford Expedition I in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic is able to carry by 26 liters more fuel than the Nissan Terrano II.
The Ford Expedition I has 14 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Nissan Terrano II. As a result the Ford Expedition I is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
The Ford Expedition I has 93 percent larger engine capacity than the Nissan Terrano II. The difference is relatively large. As a result the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement usually equals worst fuel consumption.
The Ford Expedition I is 11 percent longer in relation to the Nissan Terrano II. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Ford Expedition I very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Ford Expedition I will be better driven but the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
A V engine is a
better version of a
engine with cylinders arranged in a straight
which according to us is
adventages. Engine of V configuration
put in a car the Ford Expedition I
produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
engime may house high numbers of
cylinders without significant growth in its
Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is
to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
Number of doors
There’s no doubts that the five-door Ford is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Nissan very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual may be more appropriate.
Model release date
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Ford Expedition I may feature more advanced technologies.
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic, which is by 2 percent higher than the Nissan, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
For a drive around town, it is worth to have an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.