Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic vs Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual

Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Ford Expedition I, model available from 1996 to 2003.
It has 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2003.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

3 reasons for

Nissan Terrano II, model available from 1993 to 2003.
It has 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 1993 to 1996.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual
Ford

21 reasons for Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218KM automat in comparison to Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

218 > 124 hp
The Ford is equipped with petrol which produce by 94 more horsepower over the the engine of the Nissan Terrano II, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be better option for drivers who want to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12 > 13.2 s
A little difference in the amount of 9 % indicates that the Nissan is the worst vehicle of these two . In the „full-size SUV segment, being represented by the Nissan Terrano II, the medium acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 2.7 s higher than this of Nissan vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

1,725 > 115 l
The trunk of the Ford Expedition I is 1,610 l more spacious in comparison to the Nissan. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic will be much more handy. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can load.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

3,132 > 1,650 l
33

Top speed

179 > 160 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Ford is greater than this of the Nissan by 19 kilometers per hour, which allows the Ford Expedition I to travel faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 19 kilometers/hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,996 > 1,755 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic is 14 % wider when compared to the Nissan Terrano II. It is clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

97 > 71 l
The Nissan Terrano II loses with the Ford Expedition I in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic is able to carry by 26 liters more fuel than the Nissan Terrano II.
15

Wheelbase

3,019 > 2,650 mm
The Ford Expedition I has 14 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Nissan Terrano II. As a result the Ford Expedition I is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
8

Engine capacity

4,602 > 2,390 cc
The Ford Expedition I has 93 percent larger engine capacity than the Nissan Terrano II. The difference is relatively large. As a result the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement usually equals worst fuel consumption.
6

Length

5,201 > 4,693 mm
The Ford Expedition I is 11 percent longer in relation to the Nissan Terrano II. The length of the vehicle plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Ford Expedition I very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Ford Expedition I will be better driven but the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,666 > 1,430 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a better version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which according to us is with more adventages. Engine of V configuration put in a car the Ford Expedition I produces more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house high numbers of cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Ford is more convenient and if you frequently carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s as well easier to place luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Nissan very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have more than one passengers in the car the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual may be more appropriate.
1

Model release date

1996 > 1993
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 3 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Ford Expedition I may feature more advanced technologies.
1

Height

1,887 > 1,852 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic, which is by 2 percent higher than the Nissan, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a drive around town, it is worth to have an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a substantial effect on fuel consumption. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,400 > 5,200 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,661 > 1,455 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

2,200 > 1,620 kg

Nissan

3 reasons for Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124KM manual in comparison to Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

11.1 > 18 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual's advantage. This automobile burns 38 % fewer petrol in the combined cycle than the Ford Expedition I. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the large 4x4 segment, in which the Nissan Terrano II is classified, is 12.2 l while the Nissan Terrano II consumes by 9 % less amount of fuel than the average.
19

Range

649 > 544 km
0

Valves per cylinder

3 > 2

Cars specifications

Ford Expedition I 4.6 i V8 16V XLT 218HP automatic Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 1993
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 2,305 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK