Hummer H2 Standard 6.0 V8 316HP vs Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Hummer H2 Standard 6.0 V8 316HP

Source: wikipedia.org Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

8 reasons for

Hummer H2 Standard, model available from 2002.
It has 6.0 V8 316HP petrol engine produced from 2002.
Drive has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Ford Expedition II, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic
Hummer

8 reasons for Hummer H2 Standard 6.0 V8 316KM in comparison to Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

316 > 235 hp
The Hummer has by 81 horsepowers more horsepower than Ford Expedition II. The Hummer H2 Standard 6.0 V8 316HP will be distinctly better accelerate owing to bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also overtaking other cars while driving should be a piece of cake for the Hummer H2 equipped with stronger motor.
38

Trunk capacity

870 > 570 l
The Hummer H2 features 300 l bigger luggage compartment compared with the Ford Expedition II. Such a difference is significant so it will affect the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Hummer H2 has 115 liters bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Larger boot will be useful during family traveling as well as while daily driving.
22

Width

2,057 > 2,000 mm
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The width of the Hummer is larger by 3 % in comparison to the Ford Expedition II and is not really important. The average for the „large SUV” class equals to approximately 1,866 millimeters and is by 191 millimeters smaller than the width of the Hummer H2.
15

Wheelbase

3,119 > 3,025 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. Hummer H2 has 3 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Hummer should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
4

Rear track

1,765 > 1,707 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,976 > 1,971 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 5 mm to the advantage of the Hummer is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,759 > 1,702 mm

Ford

3 reasons for Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235KM automat in comparison to Hummer H2 Standard 6.0 V8 316HP

Reasons for
6

Length

5,228 > 4,820 mm
The Ford Expedition II is 8 % longer when compared to the Hummer H2. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Ford Expedition II preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Ford will be better driven but the Hummer will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2003 > 2002
Given that the Hummer's production began only 1 year earlier than the Ford Expedition II, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Ford might have slightly more modern solutions applied in it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For those who value more functional driving a vehicle and who don’t need complications resulting from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic gearbox. For those who enjoy sporting driving a manual gearbox might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a shift take place.

Cars specifications

Hummer H2 Standard 6.0 V8 316HP Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2002 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 3,061 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK