Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Ford Expedition II, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

4 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
Ford

19 reasons for Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235KM automat in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

235 > 170 hp
The horsepower is a something that most of drivers take into account at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic that has by 38 percent more horsepower in relation to the Mitsubishi. Therefore the Ford will achieve higher top speed. With more horsepower the Ford should also give seemingly better flexiblility in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

394 > 253 Nm
The Ford has 141 Nm more torque than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Although most of people do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it describes the best how fast a vehicle is speeding up. When it comes to compared vehicles the difference is substantial thus the Ford Expedition II will deliver you better feeling of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.5 > 12.8 s
A small difference in the amount of 10 percent shows that the Mitsubishi is slightly beaten in this confrontation. In the „large 4x4 ” segment, to which the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 2.3 s faster than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s vehicle.
33

Top speed

190 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Ford Expedition II is greater than of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 by 15 km/h, which allows the Ford Expedition II to cover quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 9 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,450 > 4,495 revolutions/minute
The RMP at which the maximum torque is produced tells us how fast an engine achieves its full performance with growth in rmp. The lower revolutions or the longer range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
22

Width

2,000 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ford Expedition II is 305 millimeters wider when compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,725 mm
Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic has 11 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,602 > 2,971 cc
The Ford Expedition II has 1,631 cc bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Mitsubishi. The difference is relatively big. For this reason the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel economy.
6

Length

5,228 > 4,610 mm
The Ford Expedition II is 13 % longer in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4. Long vehicles have more interior space and also provide more storage space. While the Ford Expedition II seems to be better for families or persons who value convenient driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Mitsubishi may appeal to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,707 > 1,434 mm
1

Model release date

2003 > 1996
Manufacture of the older car began much more earlier than its competitor thus we may expect that this car has significantly less modern technologies applied.
1

Height

1,971 > 1,720 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Ford Expedition II, which is by 251 mm higher than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4, is appropriate option for you. However, compared cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

265 > 245 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,750 > 5,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Front track

1,702 > 1,422 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Curb weight

2,453 > 1,835 kg

Mitsubishi

4 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

13.5 > 17.3 l
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 consumes 22 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Ford. The difference in the amount of 22 percent will be realy noticeable in everyday usage of the vehicle. In the long run it will bring you a substantial cost reduction.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2006
0

Valves

24 > 16

Cars specifications

Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2003 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,061 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK