Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic vs Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Ford Expedition II, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

10 reasons for

Porsche Cayenne I, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2006.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4
Ford

17 reasons for Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235KM automat in comparison to Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

570 > 540 l
The trunk of the Ford is only 30 liters bigger than the Porsche Cayenne I. However, the difference is so little that it would be fair to say that both cars have similar boot capacity.
22

Width

2,000 > 1,928 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic is 72 millimeters wider in comparison to the Porsche Cayenne I. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 101 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Ford Expedition II which can hold by 4 percent more fuel than the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,848 mm
The Ford Expedition II has 177 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4. Consequently the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
14

Cylinders

8 > 6
8

Engine capacity

4,602 > 3,188 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic is by 1,414 cc larger when compared to the Porsche Cayenne I. As a result the Porsche will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Ford will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

5,228 > 4,782 mm
The Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic is 446 mm longer than the Porsche Cayenne I. Long cars more of passenger space and also have bigger trunk. Although the Ford seems to be better option for families or persons who value comfortable rides, the Porsche Cayenne I may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,707 > 1,665 mm
1

Model release date

2003 > 2002
Given that the Porsche Cayenne I started to be manufactured only 1 year earlier than the Ford Expedition II, the distance in technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic might feature slightly more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Tire width

265 > 255 mm
1

Height

1,971 > 1,699 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Ford Expedition II, which is by 16 percent higher than the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4, is better pick for you. However, these two cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a gentle drive in the city, it is good to have an automatic however the choice of transmisison may have a big effect on fuel efficiency. Automatics may consume somewhere from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,750 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,061 > 2,941 kg
0

Front track

1,702 > 1,647 mm
0

Curb weight

2,453 > 2,162 kg

Porsche

10 reasons for Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

250 > 235 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Porsche that has by 6 % horsepower more in relation to the Ford Expedition II, which makes this car somewhat better in terms of high speed. Due to more horsepower the Porsche Cayenne I will as well provide a bit better efficiency in specific gears.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.1 > 11.5 s
A small difference in the amount of 2.4 s suggests that the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic is the worst car of these two . In the „large off-road 4x4 segment, being represented by the Ford, the average acceleration amounts to 10.5 s and is by 1 second higher than this of Ford car.
33

Top speed

214 > 190 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Ford which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 24 kilometers per hour is little and is imperceptible in daily driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,769 > 1,721 l
8

Maximum load capacity

785 > 607 kg
3

Price range

sports > popular
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic Porsche Cayenne I 3.2 i V6 24V 250HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular sports
    Model release date 2003 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,061 kg 2,941 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK