Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual vs Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

12 reasons for

Toyota Sequoia I, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 4.7 V8 32V 243HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

11 reasons for

Ford Expedition II, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP ic petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has automatic gearbox.

Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic
Toyota

12 reasons for Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243KM manual in comparison to Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

243 > 235 hp
The horsepower of the Toyota Sequoia I is by 3 percent grater in comparison to the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic. While the difference is not big this should not affect the car performance in a noticeable way.
38

Trunk capacity

785 > 570 l
The Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual features 215 liters larger luggage compartment than the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic. Such a difference is quite significant so it will is relevant to the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Toyota Sequoia I has 30 liters bigger trunk capacity than the average in its segment. Roomy boot will be useful during family traveling and also during everyday driving.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,301 > 1,721 l
22

Width

2,032 > 2,000 mm
distance between left and right side of a car affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Toyota Sequoia I is larger by 2 % in relation to the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large SUV” class amounts to approximately 1,866 mm and is by 9 percent larger than the same attribute of the Toyota Sequoia I.
15

Wheelbase

3,102 > 3,025 mm
The Toyota Sequoia I has 3 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to Ford Expedition II. Therefore the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 4,602 cc
The Toyota Sequoia I has 62 cc bigger engine size in comparison to the Ford Expedition II. As the difference is small, the Toyota Sequoia I should accelerate only slightly dynamically, of course assuming that other paramerters are the same.
8

Maximum load capacity

650 > 607 kg
4

Rear track

1,752 > 1,707 mm
0

Front track

1,726 > 1,702 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006
0

Valves

32 > 16

Ford

11 reasons for Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235KM automat in comparison to Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Reasons for
33

Top speed

190 > 175 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Ford is greater in comparison to this of the Toyota Sequoia I which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 15 km/h is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 100 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Ford that can contain 5 liters more fuel compared with the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual. The average fuel tank capacity in the full-size SUV segment, from which the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic comes from, amounts to 84 l, whereas in large SUV segment (represented by the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual) it equals 84 l.
6

Length

5,228 > 5,209 mm
The Ford is 19 mm longer in comparison to the Toyota Sequoia I. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Ford Expedition II preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic will be better driven ,however, the Toyota will be a little easier to park because of shorter length .
1

Model release date

2003 > 2001
Because of the fact that the Toyota Sequoia I debuted only 2 years earlier than the Ford Expedition II, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic might have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
1

Tire width

265 > 245 mm
1

Height

1,971 > 1,956 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 15 millimeters to the advantage of the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic is little and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is in the Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic despite having a few drawback offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long ride especially in the city you probably would be less tired. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,750 > 4,800 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,061 > 2,945 kg
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″

Cars specifications

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual Ford Expedition II 4.6 i V8 16V 235HP automatic
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2001 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,945 kg 3,061 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK