Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual vs Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual

Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

22 reasons for

Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback, model available from 1995 to 2004.
It has 1.6 90HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2000.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Fiesta IV, model available from 1995 to 1999.
It has 1.25 i 16V 75HP petrol engine produced from 1995 to 1999.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual
Mitsubishi

22 reasons for Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90KM manual in comparison to Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

90 > 75 hp
The horsepower of the Mitsubishi is by 20 percent bigger than the Ford Fiesta IV. As the difference is small this should not affect the car performance largely.
59

Maximal torque

135 > 110 Nm
Maximum torque of the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback is 25 Nm bigger than the Ford. For this reason, the Mitsubishi will accelerate slightly better and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual will use less fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12 > 12.7 s
The Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 12 seconds, which is 0.7 s better result when compared to the Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
38

Trunk capacity

432 > 250 l
The Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback features 182 l larger trunk in relation to the Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual. Such a difference is quite significant therefore it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual has 6 % bigger trunk size than the average in its class. Larger boot will be useful during family journeys as well as while daily car’s usage.
33

Top speed

180 > 170 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback is higher as compared to this of the Ford Fiesta IV which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 6 percent is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,995 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is reached has an impact on an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to get a whole view on an engine efficiency, it is always recommended to check a torque graph.
22

Width

1,713 > 1,634 mm
Width of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback is widther by 5 percent compared with the Ford Fiesta IV and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „D” class is approximately 1,764 millimeters and is by 51 mm bigger than the same attribute of the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual.
19

Range

811 > 563 km
19

Fuel tank

59 > 39 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Mitsubishi which can carry 51 % more fuel compared with the Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual. The medium fuel container size in the middle class, which is represented by the Mitsubishi Carisma, amounts to 63 l, whereas in subcompact class (represented by the Ford Fiesta IV) it amounts to 44 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,559 > 2,442 mm
Mitsubishi has 5 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

632 > 435 km
11

Extra-urban range

984 > 678 km
8

Engine capacity

1,596 > 1,243 cc
The Mitsubishi Carisma has 353 cc greater engine size than the Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual. The difference is notable. Consequently the Mitsubishi should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

545 > 523 kg
6

Length

4,475 > 3,831 mm
The Mitsubishi Carisma is 644 mm longer in relation to the Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual. Long cars have more interior space and usually have bigger trunk. Although the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual seems to be better pick for families or those who value comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford Fiesta IV may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,467 > 1,373 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Mitsubishi Carisma is more usable and if you frequently carry more than one passenger then it’s the format to go for. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the rear seats but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Ford generally look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Ford Fiesta IV might be more appropriate.
1

Height

1,404 > 1,318 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 7 % in favor of the Mitsubishi is small and should not be really noticeable.
0

Payload

1,630 > 1,435 kg
0

Front track

1,474 > 1,429 mm
0

End of model sale

2004 > 1999
0

Curb weight

1,090 > 909 kg

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.1 > 7.6 l
The Ford Fiesta IV uses 0.5 l less in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Carisma. The difference in the amount of 7 % is not very appreciable. Nevertheless within some time it can generate a substantial cost reduction.
56

Urban consumption

9.4 > 9.5 l
The Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual burns up 0.1 l less fuel running around the town compared to the Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback. The Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual, that comes from B segment, uses 1.9 l less petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the B class is 7.5 l, whereas the Ford Fiesta IV needs by 26 % more fuel than the average.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

929 > 658 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.9 > 6.1 l
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Carisma Hatchback 1.6 90HP manual Ford Fiesta IV 1.25 i 16V 75HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,275 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1995 1995
    Facelifting no no
    Class D B
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK