Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual vs Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual

Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

14 reasons for

Volvo V50, model available from 2004 to 2012.
It has 1.8 125HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d, model available from 2003 to 2011.
It has 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2011.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual
Volvo

14 reasons for Volvo V50 1.8 125KM manual in comparison to Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

419 > 396 l
The boot of the Volvo is only 6 percent bigger than the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot space.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,307 > 1,246 l
33

Top speed

200 > 198 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual is greater in relation to this of the Ford by 1, which allows the Volvo V50 to travel quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 1 % is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
19

Range

822 > 757 km
19

Fuel tank

60 > 52 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Volvo V50 that can hold 8 liters more fuel in relation to the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual. The average fuel tank capacity in the C segment, from which the Volvo V50 comes from, is 52 liters, whereas in compact segment (represented by the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d) it is 52 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,642 > 2,637 mm
Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual has 5 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

612 > 558 km
8

Maximum load capacity

507 > 433 kg
6

Length

4,526 > 4,342 mm
The Volvo is 4 percent longer when compared to the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Volvo V50 probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual will be better driven but the Ford Focus II will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length .
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual is more usable and if you regularly carry more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door vehicle is that it’s not only easier for passengers to climb into the back but it’s also easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual generally look much cooler and for those who rarely have passengers in the back seat the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d may be a good one.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2004 > 2003
Because of the fact that the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d was introduced only 1 year prior to the Volvo, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really big, however, the Volvo V50 might have slightly more advanced solutions applied in it.
0

Payload

1,890 > 1,839 kg
0

End of model sale

2012 > 2011

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125KM manual in comparison to Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7 > 7.2 l
The Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d consumes 0.2 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual. The Ford Focus II, being classified in „compact” segment consumes by 0.2 l more fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 6.8 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.7 > 9.8 l
The Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d burns up 1 percent fewer petrol running around the town compared to the Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual. The Ford, which comes from lower middle segment, burns up 1 liter less petrol. It is also worth to know that average fuel consumption in the urban for the compact class equals to 8.7 l, while the Ford Focus II needs by 12 % more amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.3 > 11 s
The Ford can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 10.3 s, which is 6 % quicker than the Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into consideration when buying a automobile.
22

Width

1,840 > 1,770 mm
Width of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability while driving. The Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual is widther only by 70 mm compared with the Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual and is not really worth considering. The average for the „small family cars” class amounts to 1,703 mm and is by 137 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Ford.
1

Height

1,495 > 1,456 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual, which is by 3 percent higher than the Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual, is appropriate choice for you. However, presented cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Curb weight

1,402 > 1,383 kg

Cars specifications

Volvo V50 1.8 125HP manual Ford Focus II Hatchback 3d 1.8 Duratec Flexifuel 125HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,081 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2004 2003
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK