Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual vs Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Kickaffe (Mario Lehmann) Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

11 reasons for

Mazda 3 III Hatchback, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
Mazda

11 reasons for Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165KM manual in comparison to Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

165 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda is by 10 percent grater in relation to the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d. As the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance considerably.
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 6 l
The Mazda 3 III uses 0.4 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. The Mazda 3 III, being classified in „small family cars” segment burns up by 1.2 l less of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
56

Urban consumption

7.3 > 7.9 l
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback consumes 8 percent less fuel running around the town in comparison to the Ford Focus III. The Mazda 3 III, which comes from small family cars segment, burns up 1.4 l less fuel. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the lower middle class equals to 8.7 l, while the Mazda needs by 16 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.2 > 8.6 s
A little difference in the amount of 5 % indicates that the Ford Focus III is somewhat beaten here. In the „small family cars” segment, to which the Ford is assigned, the average acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 2.7 s slower than acceleration of Ford’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

365 > 318 l
If you are looking for a car for long journeys, which could room more luggage , take the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual. The Ford has by 15 percent less capable boot in relation to the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d so probably in this case you would be able to carry a bit less. When it comes to the boot also check its width length and height which have considerable impact on loading capability .
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,248 > 1,099 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.8 > 5 l
22

Width

2,056 > 1,823 mm
Width of a car influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual is larger only by 233 mm than the Ford Focus III and is not really important. The average for the „lower middle” segment amounts to 1,703 mm and is by 353 mm smaller than the width of the Mazda 3 III.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,597 cc
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback has 401 cc greater engine size when compared to the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. The difference is relatively big. For this reason the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement usually affects worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,464 > 4,355 mm
The Mazda 3 III Hatchback is 3 percent longer in relation to the Ford Focus III. Long cars have more interior space and usually provide more storage space. While the Mazda seems to be better for families or drivers who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
Given that the Ford Focus III was launched only 2 years earlier than the Mazda 3 III, the distance in technology used in both vehicles is not really big, however, the Mazda might have slightly more modern solutions applied in it.

Ford

10 reasons for Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

270 > 209 Nm
Thanks to 29 percent greater torque, the engine of the Ford distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Mazda. This, in turn, produces better a car's acceleration.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,900 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered distinctly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Ford. The engine of the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 53 percent lower compared with the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual.
19

Range

917 > 879 km
19

Fuel tank

54 > 51 l
The Mazda 3 III is worst that the Ford in the category of fuel tank size. The Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d is able to hold by 3 liters more fuel in comparison to the Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual.
12

Urban range

714 > 680 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,100 > 1,063 km
1

Height

1,484 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Ford, which is by 34 millimeters higher than the Mazda 3 III Hatchback, is appropriate option for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,335 > 1,281 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda 3 III Hatchback 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 165HP manual Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,800 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK