Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual vs Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

12 reasons for

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 PureTech 110HP petrol engine produced from 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

11 reasons for

Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
Peugeot

12 reasons for Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110KM manual in comparison to Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.6 > 6 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Peugeot 308 II's advantage. This car consumes 23 percent fewer gasoline in the mixed cycle compared to the Ford Focus III. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the compact segment, in which the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d is classified, is 6.8 l whereas the Peugeot 308 II needs by 32 % less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

5.8 > 7.9 l
The fuel consumption (urban) is considerably to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d's advantage. This vehicle uses 2.1 l fewer petrol in city traffic when compared to the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. Better fuel consumption equals less fuel cost passed on you.
38

Trunk capacity

419 > 318 l
The Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d features 101 l bigger trunk than the Ford Focus III. Such a difference is big so it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. At the same time that the Peugeot 308 II has 26 liters bigger boot capacity than the average in the same class. Larger boot will be useful during family traveling as well as during daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,495 > 1,900 revolutions/minute
A greater range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is delivered determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always good to see a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 5 l
19

Range

1,152 > 917 km
12

Urban range

914 > 714 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,359 > 1,100 km
1

Model release date

2013 > 2011
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual may feature more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Width without outside mirrors

1,866 > 1,862 mm
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,038 > 2,009 mm

Ford

11 reasons for Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 110 hp
The Ford is equipped with petrol which produce by 40 more horsepower over the Peugeot, transforming the car to a more sporty character. It should be googd car to those who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

270 > 204 Nm
The Ford Focus III has 66 Nm more torque when compared to the Peugeot. The difference at such level is quite big, so that the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d will accelerate significantly better.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.6 > 11.1 s
A little difference that amounts to 23 percent indicates that the Peugeot is the worst car of these two presented. In the „lower middle class, being represented by the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual, the medium acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 0.2 s lower than this of Peugeot vehicle.
33

Top speed

210 > 188 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Ford Focus III is higher in comparison to this of the Peugeot which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 22 kilometers/hour is not big and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,823 > 1,809 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Ford is widther by 14 mm than the Peugeot and is not really important. The medium for the „lower middle” segment amounts to 1,703 millimeters and is by 7 percent larger than the same feature of the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,200 cc
The engine size of the Ford Focus III is by 33 percent larger in relation to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. For this reason the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual will consume less fuel, however, the engine of the Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual will be of better performance, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,355 > 4,249 mm
The Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual is 106 mm longer in comparison to the Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d. Long cars more of passenger space and in most cases have bigger trunk. Although the Ford seems to be better option for families or drivers who value convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Peugeot 308 II may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
1

Height

1,484 > 1,456 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 28 millimeters to the advantage of the Ford Focus III is little and does not matter much.
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,335 > 1,265 kg

Cars specifications

Peugeot 308 II Hatchback 5d 1.2 PureTech 110HP manual Ford Focus III Hatchback 5d 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,722 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK