Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual vs Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual

Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

10 reasons for

Ford Ka III, model available from 2008.
It has 1.2 Duratec 69HP petrol engine produced from 2008.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Kia Picanto I, model available from 2004.
It has 1.0 SOHC 62HP petrol engine produced from 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual
Ford

10 reasons for Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69KM manual in comparison to Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

69 > 62 hp
The horsepower is a something that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual which has by 7 horsepower more than the Kia, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Due to more horsepower the Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual will as well provide somewhat better efficiency in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 5 l
The Ford Ka III uses 2 % fewer in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Kia. The difference in the amount of 2 % is not realy noticeable. At the same time in the long run it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13.2 > 15.8 s
A little difference at the level of 17 % shows that the Kia Picanto I is slightly beaten here. In the „city cars” class, to which the Kia is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 14.4 s and is by 10 % faster than acceleration of Kia’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

224 > 157 l
With more trunk space the Ford will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull vehicle compared with the Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual. If the capacity of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual will be better choice as it is about 67 l larger than the trunk of its contender.
33

Top speed

159 > 150 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Ford is greater compared with this of the Kia Picanto I by 9 km/h, which allows the Ford Ka III to cover quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 9 km/h is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,658 > 1,595 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Ford is 4 percent wider in comparison to the Kia Picanto I. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
8

Engine capacity

1,243 > 998 cc
The Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual has by 245 cc greater cubic capacity when compared to the Kia Picanto I. This play a little role in terms of acceleration, as both figures are quite simmilar.
6

Length

3,620 > 3,495 mm
The Ford is 125 millimeters longer when compared to the Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Ford Ka III probably will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Ford Ka III will be better driven ,however, the Kia Picanto I will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2004
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 4 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual may feature more modern solutions.
1

Height

1,507 > 1,478 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 29 millimeters in favor of the Ford is little and should not be really noticeable.

Kia

9 reasons for Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62KM manual in comparison to Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

5.7 > 6 l
The Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual burns up of 5 percent fuel fewer in city traffic than the Ford Ka III. The Kia, which is classified in city cars segment, uses of 0.8 l per 100 km less than the medium level in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “minicompact cars” class equals to 6.5 l of fuel for every 100 km.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

884 > 749 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 4.4 l
19

Range

729 > 714 km
12

Urban range

614 > 603 km
11

Extra-urban range

814 > 795 km
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual is more usable and if you frequently drive with more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s also easier to place luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Ford Ka III generally look more dynamic and sporty and for those who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Ford Ka III may be better one, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Payload

1,347 > 1,320 kg

Cars specifications

Ford Ka III 1.2 Duratec 69HP manual Kia Picanto I 1.0 SOHC 62HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2004
    Facelifting no no
    Class A A
    Payload 1,320 kg 1,347 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK