Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Kuga I 2.5 Duratec 200HP manual 4x4

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

11 reasons for

Land Rover Freelander II, model available from 2006.
It has 2.0 Si4 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Kuga I, model available from 2008 to 2012.
It has 2.5 Duratec 200HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2012.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Kuga I 2.5 Duratec 200HP manual 4x4
Land Rover

11 reasons for Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Kuga I 2.5 Duratec 200HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 200 hp
The horsepower of the Land Rover Freelander II is by 20 % grater in relation to the Ford Kuga I. While the difference is small it should not affect the car performance to a large extent.
112

Average consumption

9.4 > 9.9 l
The Land Rover Freelander II burns up 0.5 l less in the combined cycle when compared to the Ford. The difference at the level of 0.5 l is not significant. At the same time during a longer period of time it can generate a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 14.1 l
The Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 consumes 6 % fewer fuel in city traffic in relation to the Ford. The Land Rover Freelander II, that represents small off-road 4x4 class, burns up 3.7 l fewer gasoline. Note that average fuel consumption in the urban for the compact SUV class equals to 9.6 l, while the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 consumes by 39 % more amount of fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

754 > 361 l
The boot of the Land Rover is 109 percent more spacious compared to the Ford Kuga I. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 will be a way more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,671 > 1,405 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

7.5 > 7.6 l
6

Length

4,500 > 4,447 mm
The Land Rover is 53 millimeters longer than the Ford Kuga I. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also provide bigger trunk. Although the Land Rover seems to be better for families or persons who love the idea of convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford may be more appropriate to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For a ride around town, it is tempting to opt for an automatic but the type of transmisison may have a substantial impact on fuel consumption. Automatics may burn up from 5 to 10% more than manuals.
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,191 > 2,127 mm
0

Curb weight

1,778 > 1,606 kg

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Kuga I 2.5 Duratec 200KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.2 > 8.6 s
The Ford can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 8.2 s, which is 5 percent faster in relation to the Land Rover. But the difference is not as much big to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Top speed

210 > 200 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Ford is higher as compared to this of the Land Rover Freelander II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 10 kilometers/hour is small and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
8

Engine capacity

2,522 > 1,998 cc
The engine displacement of the Ford Kuga I 2.5 Duratec 200HP manual 4x4 is by 26 % bigger in relation to the Land Rover Freelander II. In a consequence the Land Rover Freelander II will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Ford Kuga I will be of better quality, working more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
8

Gross trailer weight

2,100 > 2,003 kg
1

Model release date

2008 > 2006
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Ford Kuga I may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.

Cars specifications

Land Rover Freelander II 2.0 Si4 240HP automatic 4x4 Ford Kuga I 2.5 Duratec 200HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 2,003 kg 2,100 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2006 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK