Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

16 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Honda CR-V IV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4
Ford

16 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.8 l
The Ford Kuga II uses 1.2 l fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Honda CR-V IV. The Ford Kuga II, being palced in „mini 4x4” segment uses by 0.9 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

240 > 192 Nm
Because of 48 Nm higher torque, the engine of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual does a much better job of transmitting power to the wheels than the Honda CR-V IV. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

8.5 > 9.4 l
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual uses 10 percent less fuel while driving inside city compared to the Honda CR-V IV. The Ford, that represents mini 4x4 segment, burns up 1.1 l less petrol. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small off-road 4x4 class is 9.6 l, while the Ford Kuga II needs by 11 percent less fuel than the average.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 10.2 s
The Ford Kuga II can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 9.7 s, which is 0.5 s in comparison to the Honda CR-V IV. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 1,145 l
33

Top speed

195 > 190 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Ford is greater than the Honda CR-V IV by 3, which allows the Ford to travel faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 4,300 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is generated distinctly indicates that a vehicle with an engine that doesn’t need taking it up at high revs is this of the Ford Kuga II. The engine of the Honda CR-V IV reaches its full efficiency at 4,300 revolutions/minute which is by 63 % worst result compared with the Ford.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 6.4 l
22

Width

1,838 > 1,820 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Ford Kuga II is larger by 1 percent than the Honda CR-V IV and is not really important. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class is 1,797 mm and is by 41 millimeters smaller than the width of the Ford Kuga II.
15

Wheelbase

2,693 > 2,624 mm
Ford has 3 percent longer wheelbase than the Honda CR-V IV. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
9

Ground clearance

190 > 165 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in several relevant features of a car. Clearance is the most important for off-road vehicles still all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual has 25 millimeters higher clearance than the Honda CR-V IV. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Ford Kuga II will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,995 > 1,700 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,500 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,100 > 2,079 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 605 kg
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,518 kg

Honda

6 reasons for Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Honda CR-V IV is 3 % grater when compared to the Ford. As the difference is small it should not affect the car performance extensively.
38

Trunk capacity

590 > 456 l
With more boot size the Honda will have much more room for transporting things and be more usefull car than the Ford Kuga II. If the size of the luggage compartment is appeals to you, the Honda will be better to buy because it is about 29 percent more spacious than the boot of its competitor.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,597 cc
The Honda has 25 percent bigger cubic capacity in relation to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. The difference is relatively considerable. For this reason the Honda CR-V IV should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine size usually means worst fuel efficiency.
8

Maximum load capacity

558 > 520 kg
6

Length

4,570 > 4,524 mm
The Honda CR-V IV is 46 mm longer in comparison to the Ford Kuga II. The length of the car plays a role in terms of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Honda preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Ford will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
0

Maximal roof load

80 > 75 kg

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual Honda CR-V IV 2.0 i-VTEC 155HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg 1,700 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK