Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

14 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Mazda CX-5, model available from 2011.
It has 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4
Ford

14 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

240 > 207 Nm
The Ford Kuga II has 33 newton meters more torque when compared to the Mazda CX-5. Although most of people do not appreciate the maximum torque when buying a car, it informs the best how a car acclerates. When it comes to compared cars the difference is quite small and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 10.5 s
A small difference that amounts to 0.8 s suggests that the Mazda CX-5 is the worst car of these two presented. In the „compact SUV class, being represented by the Mazda CX-5, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 4 percent lower than this of Mazda vehicle.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 1,622 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 4,005 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. The engine of the Mazda achieves its full efficiency at 4,005 revolutions/minute which is by 60 percent lower than the Ford.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 5.8 l
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 500 kg
8

Gross trailer weight

1,995 > 1,803 kg
1

Model release date

2012 > 2011
The difference in debut day between compared cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a fast pace and for that reason the Ford may have more modern solutions.
1

Height

1,745 > 1,668 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Ford Kuga II, which is by 77 millimeters higher than the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4, would be better pick for you. However, these two cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

75 > 50 kg
0

Payload

2,100 > 2,000 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 726 kg
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,500 kg

Mazda

12 reasons for Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

160 > 150 hp
The horsepower of the Mazda CX-5 is by 10 hp bigger than the Ford Kuga II. As the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance largely.
112

Average consumption

6.4 > 6.6 l
The Mazda uses 0.2 l fewer in the combined cycle in relation to the Ford. The difference in the amount of 3 % is not realy noticeable. However in the long run it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

7.9 > 8.5 l
The Mazda burns up 7 percent fewer petrol in the city in relation to the Ford Kuga II. The Mazda CX-5, that comes from mini 4x4 segment, uses 1.7 l less petrol. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the small off-road 4x4 segment is 9.6 l, while the Mazda CX-5 consumes by 17 % less amount of fuel than the average.
38

Trunk capacity

503 > 456 l
If you are looking for a vehicles for long cruises, which could load more things in the boot , take the Mazda CX-5. The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual is equiped with by 47 l smaller boot compared with the Ford Kuga II so in this case you would be able to load one little suitcase less. Assessing the trunk pay attention to its width length and height which have considerable impact on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

197 > 195 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Mazda is greater as compared to this of the Ford Kuga II which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 2 kilometers per hour is small and is imperceptible in daily use.
22

Width

1,843 > 1,838 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The width of the Mazda CX-5 is larger by 5 mm in comparison to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 3 % smaller than the same attribute of the Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4.
15

Wheelbase

2,700 > 2,693 mm
Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4 has 7 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
9

Ground clearance

209 > 190 mm
Ground clearance is the gap between the vehicle underbody and the road. As for these two cars, it is the Mazda which has 19 mm higher ride height in relation to the Ford Kuga II. For this reason the Mazda CX-5 will deal better in difficult terrain and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively affect the handling of the vehicle.
8

Engine capacity

1,998 > 1,597 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Mazda is by 401 cc larger in comparison to the Ford Kuga II. As a result the Ford will consume less fuel, but, the engine of the Mazda CX-5 will be of better quality, running more smoothly and less prone to breaking down.
6

Length

4,537 > 4,524 mm
The Mazda CX-5 is 13 millimeters longer than the Ford. The length of the car is important when it comes to driving comfort and space in the boot. The Mazda CX-5 very likely will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Mazda will be better driven but the Ford Kuga II will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,590 > 1,565 mm
0

Front track

1,582 > 1,561 mm

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual Mazda CX-5 2.0 SKYACTIV-G 160HP manual 4x4
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg 1,803 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2011
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK