Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, model available from 2012.
It has 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP petrol engine produced from 2012 to 2014.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
Ford

22 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 147 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that majority of drivers pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual that has by 3 horsepower more in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, which makes this vehicle somewhat faster. Because of more horsepower the Ford should as well provide slightly better efficiency in specific gears.
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 7.7 l
The Ford Kuga II uses 14 % less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual, being palced in „mini 4x4” class burns up by 0.9 l less of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.5 l.
59

Maximal torque

240 > 197 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford is 43 newton meters bigger than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV. Because of this, the Ford Kuga II will accelerate a little bit swifter and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual will burn up less fuel per 100 kilometers.
56

Urban consumption

8.5 > 9.7 l
The Ford uses 12 % less in the urban cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Outlander III. The difference at the level of 1.2 l is not perceptible in daily usage of the vehicle but in a few years it would allow you to make a real savings.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 10.8 s
A small difference amounts to 1.1 s indicates that the Mitsubishi is insignificantly beaten here. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, to which the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV is assigned, the medium acceleration amounts to 10.9 s and is by 0.1 s slower than acceleration of Mitsubishi’s car.
33

Top speed

195 > 184 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Ford Kuga II is greater in comparison to of the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual by 6, which allows the Ford to cover quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 11 kilometers per hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 4,195 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is delivered clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is the one of the Ford. The engine of the Mitsubishi Outlander III achieves its full efficiency at 4,195 revolutions/minute which is by 2,595 revolutions/minute lower than the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 6.3 l
22

Width

1,838 > 1,799 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Ford Kuga II is larger by 39 millimeters in comparison to the Mitsubishi and is not really worth considering. The average for the „small off-road 4x4” segment is 1,797 millimeters and is by 2 percent smaller than the same feature of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual.
15

Wheelbase

2,693 > 2,680 mm
Ford Kuga II has 13 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also gives more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual have a higher gear count than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV which means that Ford Kuga II should have faster acceleration and better fuel economy. But the difference is quiet little and unless you are drag racer at a timed event you would not feel the difference.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,995 > 1,600 kg
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,540 mm
1

Height

1,745 > 1,682 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual, which is by 63 millimeters higher than the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV, is appropriate pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
1

Tire width

235 > 215 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,100 > 2,065 kg
0

Gross trailer weight without breaks

752 > 750 kg
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,540 mm
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,440 kg

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147KM manual in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
9

Ground clearance

216 > 190 mm
Ground clearance is a critical factor in many important characteristics of a vehicle. Ride height is very important for SUV vehicles still all cars appreciate the higher suspension. The Mitsubishi Outlander III has 14 % higher clearance in relation to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as high curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,997 > 1,597 cc
The Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV has by 400 cubic centimeters larger engine size in relation to the Ford Kuga II. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
8

Maximum load capacity

630 > 520 kg
6

Length

4,654 > 4,524 mm
The Mitsubishi Outlander III is 130 mm longer than the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and in most cases have more storage space. Although the Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV occurs to be better pick for families or persons who value convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford Kuga II may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual Mitsubishi Outlander III SUV 2.0 DOHC MIVEC 147HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg 1,600 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK