Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Peugeot 2008, model available from 2013.
It has 1.2 VTi 82HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual
Ford

22 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 82 hp
The Ford Kuga II has by 68 hp more horsepower in comparison to Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual. The Ford Kuga II will be distinctly faster speed up owing to grater power. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing other cars while moving along the road should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

240 > 117 Nm
When you push the gas and you start speeding up rapidly, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will notice it better sitting at the steering wheel of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual because it has by 123 Nm more torque in relation to the Peugeot 2008. Compared cars differ so much that only driving the Ford Kuga II you will have a pleasurable sensations of getting pressed back in the seat as the car accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 13.5 s
The Ford Kuga II speeds up to 100k\h 28 percent better than the Peugeot. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Ford Kuga II will allow him to overtake much quicker and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 350 l
The Ford features 106 l larger boot compared with the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual. Such a difference is quite significant therefore it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual has 11 l bigger trunk size than the average in the same class. Larger trunk will be useful during family traveling and also during everyday car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 1,196 l
33

Top speed

195 > 169 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Ford is greater than the Peugeot 2008 by 15, which allows the Ford Kuga II to cover faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 26 kilometers/hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 2,745 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is produced has an impact on an engine’s efficiency and flexibility. Still, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always worth to analyze a torque graph.
22

Width

1,838 > 1,739 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects interior space for travelers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual is larger by 6 percent than the Peugeot 2008 and is not really relevant. The average for the „mini 4x4” class is around 1,797 mm and is by 41 mm larger than the same attribute of the Ford Kuga II.
15

Wheelbase

2,693 > 2,548 mm
The Ford Kuga II has 6 % longer wheelbase in relation to Peugeot. Therefore the Ford Kuga II is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
11

Trunk length with seats up

843 > 752 mm
9

Ground clearance

190 > 166 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several relevant characteristics of a car. It is the most important for off-road cars though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Ford Kuga II has 24 millimeters higher clearance in relation to the Peugeot. In addition to easier mobility in rough terrain, the Ford Kuga II will also be easier to overcome city obstacles like large curbs, for example.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,200 cc
The Ford has 397 cc larger engine capacity in comparison to the Peugeot 2008. The difference is relatively substantia. For this reason the Ford should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger engine displacement means worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,524 > 4,159 mm
The Ford Kuga II is 9 % longer than the Peugeot 2008. The length of the car plays a role in terms of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Ford Kuga II very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. At the same time the Ford will be better driven but the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,487 mm
1

Height

1,745 > 1,558 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual, which is by 187 mm higher than the Peugeot, is appropriate option for you. However, presented cars do not differ much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk height

593 > 514 mm
0

Payload

2,100 > 1,577 kg
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,480 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,046 kg

Peugeot

5 reasons for Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82KM manual in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.9 > 6.6 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Peugeot 2008's advantage. This vehicle consumes 1.7 l less fuel in the combined cycle when compared with the Ford Kuga II. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Peugeot 2008 is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual consumes by 35 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 8.5 l
The Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual consumes 29 percent less fuel in the city compared with the Ford Kuga II. The difference at the level of 2.5 l will be very significant in using car. Additionally, during many months it will bring huge savings. Moreover keep in mind that estimated results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably lifted if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 5.6 l
8

Maximum load capacity

537 > 520 kg
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
The difference in debut day between these two vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace and for that reason the Peugeot may have more advanced technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual Peugeot 2008 1.2 VTi 82HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK