Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
Ford

22 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

150 > 90 hp
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual has by 67 % more horsepower than Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. The Ford Kuga II will be distinctly quicker speed up owing to bigger horsepower. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful engine.
59

Maximal torque

240 > 135 Nm
The Ford has 105 Nm more torque than the Renault. Even though a great deal of drivers do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it informs the best how fast a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are cars the difference is substantial thus the Ford Kuga II will give you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.7 > 12.9 s
A little difference in the amount of 25 % indicates that the Renault is the worst car of these two . In the „mini 4x4 segment, being represented by the Renault Captur, the average acceleration to 100km/h is 10.9 s and is by 18 % higher than this of Renault vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

456 > 377 l
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual features 79 liters more capable boot in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. Such a difference is relevant and it will is relevant to the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Ford has 3 percent bigger trunk size than the average in its segment. Roomy boot will be useful during family journeys and also while everyday car’s usage.
Add a comment
There is a hidden storage with that 455L
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 453 l
33

Top speed

195 > 171 km/h
The top velocity of the Ford is greater in comparison to this of the Renault which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 14 percent is small and is not realy noticable in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 2,500 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the highest torque is produced indicates how fast an engine reaches its full performance with growth in rotational speed. The lower rotational speed or the wider range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
22

Width

1,838 > 1,778 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Ford is 60 millimeters wider in relation to the Renault Captur. It is often clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,693 > 2,601 mm
The Ford Kuga II has 4 % longer wheelbase than Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. Consequently the Ford is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Ford Kuga II has only one additional speed in comparison to the Renault. Most often the additional speed is used as an overdrive thanks to which the previous gears can be shorter in order to allow better acceleration in the lower speeds. One more gear also affect lower fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 899 cc
The Ford Kuga II has 698 cubic centimeters bigger engine size than the Renault Captur. The difference is relatively notable. For this reason the Ford Kuga II should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine size means worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,524 > 4,122 mm
The Ford Kuga II is 402 millimeters longer in comparison to the Renault Captur. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases provide more storage space. Although the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual seems to be better for families or drivers who value comfortable rides, the Renault Captur may appeal to women as it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,514 mm
1

Height

1,745 > 1,566 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference of 11 % in favor of the Ford is not big and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

235 > 205 mm
0

Payload

2,100 > 1,662 kg
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire diameter

17 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,580 > 1,100 kg

Renault

6 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 6.6 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Renault Captur's advantage. This car uses 1.5 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. Keep in mind that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the small off-road 4x4 class, in which the Renault is classified, equals to 7.5 l whereas the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual burns up by 32 % less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 8.5 l
The Renault Captur uses 2.5 l less gasoline in city traffic when compared to the Ford Kuga II. The difference in the amount of 2.5 l is really perceptible in everyday use of the automobile. But, in a long run it will give you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may change depending on how dynamic you drive
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 5.6 l
8

Maximum load capacity

557 > 520 kg
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
Because of the fact that the Ford was launched only 1 year before the Renault Captur, the distance in technology applied in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual might have a bit more new solutions used in it.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 5,700 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK