Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

17 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

11 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
Subaru

17 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 150 hp
The Subaru has 60 % more horsepower in comparison to Ford. The Subaru will be distinctly faster speed up thanks to bigger horsepower. Also overtaking other cars while driving should be much more easier for a vehicle equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 240 Nm
The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 has 110 newton meters more torque in comparison to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. Even though most of people do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it shows the best how fast a car acclerates. When it comes to compared vehicles the difference is substantial hence the Subaru Forester IV will provide you with better feeling of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 9.7 s
A small difference amounts to 23 percent indicates that the Ford is insignificantly beaten in this confrontation. In the „mini 4x4” segment, to which the Ford is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 11 % slower than acceleration of Ford’s car.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 456 l
If you are looking for a car for long travels, which could contain more luggage , pick the Subaru Forester IV. The Ford Kuga II is equiped with by 11 % smaller trunk in relation to the Ford Kuga II so probably in this case you would be able to take with you one small parcel less. Assessing the luggage compartment check its width length and height which have considerable impact on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

221 > 195 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Subaru is higher as compared to this of the Ford which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 26 kilometers/hour is small and is not realy noticable in daily use.
9

Ground clearance

220 > 190 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the space between the vehicle underbody and the ground. taking these two cars into consideration, it is the Subaru Forester IV which has 30 millimeters higher ride height in relation to the Ford Kuga II. This is why the Subaru Forester IV will deal better with rough terrain and obstacles in the city. However, the higher ground clearance means a higher center of gravity, which can adversely influence the handling of the car.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,597 cc
The Subaru Forester IV has 25 % larger engine capacity in comparison to the Ford Kuga II. The difference is substantia. For this reason the Subaru should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually means worst fuel consumption.
8

Gross trailer weight

1,996 > 1,995 kg
6

Length

4,596 > 4,524 mm
The Subaru Forester IV is 72 mm longer than the Ford Kuga II. Long cars more of passenger space and also provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 occurs to be better for families or persons who value comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford Kuga II may appeal to the young because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer put inside the Subaru occurs to be noticeably better because it is smaller and produces less vibrations in comparison to engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line. What is more it is worth knowing that its horizontally opposed design results in that a car has a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one inside the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual, is that because of its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
1

Model release date

2013 > 2012
Because of the fact that the Ford Kuga II was introduced only 1 year before the Subaru Forester IV, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Subaru may have a bit more modern solutions applied in it.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Subaru Forester IV in spite of having a few disadvantages gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be less exhausted. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Maximal roof load

80 > 75 kg
0

Payload

2,110 > 2,100 kg
0

Tire diameter

18 > 17 ″
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,580 kg

Ford

11 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 8.3 l
The fuel economy is distinctly to Ford Kuga II's advantage. This automobile burns 21 percent fewer gasoline in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Subaru Forester IV. Interesting is that average fuel consumption in the mixed cycle for the mini 4x4 segment, in which the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual is classified, is 7.5 l while the Ford Kuga II burns up by 12 percent less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

8.5 > 11.2 l
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual burns up 2.7 l fewer fuel in the city when compared to the Subaru. The difference in the amount of 2.7 l is quite significant in daily usage of the ride. However, in a long term it will bring you significant savings. Remember that fuel consumption may change depending on how you drive
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 1,579 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 2,400 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is delivered shows us how fast an engine reaches its full performance with growth in revolutions. The lower rmp or the longer range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 7 l
22

Width

1,838 > 1,795 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Ford is 43 mm wider when compared to the Subaru Forester IV. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,693 > 2,634 mm
The Ford Kuga II has 2 percent longer wheelbase in relation to Subaru Forester IV. Consequently the Ford is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable traveling.
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 497 kg
4

Rear track

1,565 > 1,547 mm
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Front track

1,561 > 1,545 mm

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg 1,995 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK