Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

25 reasons for

Volvo XC70 II Estate, model available from 2007.
It has 3.0 T6 304HP ic petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Ford Kuga II, model available from 2012.
It has 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP petrol engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
Volvo

25 reasons for Volvo XC70 II Kombi 3.0 T6 304KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

304 > 150 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of car fans attach the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Volvo XC70 II Estate, which has by 154 more horsepower when compared to the Ford, which makes this vehicle distinctly better in terms of top speed. Having more horsepower the Volvo XC70 II Estate should as well provide distinctly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

440 > 240 Nm
Because of 83 percent more torque, the engine of the Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4 distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. This, in turn, have positive implications for a car's acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.4 > 9.7 s
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual speeds up relatively slower in relation to the Volvo XC70 II Estate. The difference at the level of 2.3 s is is slightly to the Volvo XC70 II Estate advantage, however, it should not be substantially taken by you into consideration when choosing one of compared vehicles.
38

Trunk capacity

575 > 456 l
The Volvo XC70 II features 119 liters bigger trunk in comparison to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual. Such a difference is relevant so it will distinctly matters in terms of the comfort of the car’s usage. At the same time that the Volvo XC70 II has 130 l bigger boot size than the average in the same class. Larger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during daily car’s usage.
33

Top speed

210 > 195 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the ​​Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4 is greater compared with the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual by 8, which allows the Volvo XC70 II to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 8 % is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,870 > 1,838 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on interior space for travelers as well as stability while driving. The Volvo XC70 II Estate is widther by 2 % in comparison to the Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual and is not really important. The average for the „compact SUV” segment amounts to 1,797 mm and is by 4 percent larger than the same attribute of the Volvo.
15

Wheelbase

2,821 > 2,693 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more desirable vehicle's weight distribution. Volvo XC70 II has 128 mm longer wheelbase distance when compared to Ford Kuga II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Volvo XC70 II Estate should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
11

Trunk length with seats up

1,091 > 843 mm
9

Ground clearance

211 > 190 mm
Ground clearance is a vital factor in several relevant parameters of a vehicle. It is the most important in SUV vehicles though all vehicles appreciate the higher suspension. The Volvo XC70 II has 11 % higher clearance than the Ford Kuga II. Apart from effective mobility in rough terrain, the Volvo will also be easier pushed urban obstacles such as large kerbstones, for example.
8

Engine capacity

2,954 > 1,597 cc
The Volvo has 1,357 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in comparison to the Ford Kuga II. The difference is relatively substantia. As a result the Volvo XC70 II Estate should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand bigger cubic capacity usually means worst fuel economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

576 > 520 kg
6

Length

4,836 > 4,524 mm
The Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4 is 312 millimeters longer than the Ford. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Volvo XC70 II Estate probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Volvo XC70 II Estate will be better driven but the Ford Kuga II will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,581 > 1,565 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a upgraded version of a In-line engine which as far as we are concerned is wiser to choose one. Engine of V configuration inside a vehicle the Volvo XC70 II gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is to driving fans certainly to a V engine’s advantage.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Trunk length with seats down

1,880 > 1,691 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is in the Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4 in spite of having a few drawback gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be less exhausted. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 5,700 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk height

725 > 593 mm
0

Maximal roof load

100 > 75 kg
0

Payload

2,408 > 2,100 kg
0

Front track

1,615 > 1,561 mm
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Curb weight

1,830 > 1,580 kg

Ford

7 reasons for Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150KM manual in comparison to Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

6.6 > 10.5 l
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual burns up 37 % fewer fuel in the mixed cycle than the Volvo XC70 II. The difference in the amount of 37 % will be significant in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long run it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

8.5 > 15.1 l
The Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual burns up of 6.6 l fuel less in city traffic compared to the Volvo. The Ford, which is classified in mini 4x4 segment, uses of 1.1 l/100Km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” segment equals to 9.6 l/100Km.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,693 > 1,598 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,600 > 2,100 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is produced affects an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is recommended to analyze a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 8.1 l
1

Model release date

2012 > 2007
The difference in date of commencement of production between compared vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Ford Kuga II may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,745 > 1,604 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Ford Kuga II, which is by 9 % higher than the Volvo, is better choice for you. However, these two cars do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.

Cars specifications

Volvo XC70 II Estate 3.0 T6 304HP automatic 4x4 Ford Kuga II 1.6 EcoBoost 150HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,995 kg 1,995 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2007 2012
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK