Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4 vs Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4

Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

14 reasons for

Ford Maverick I, model available from 1993 to 2000.
It has 2.4 12V 124HP petrol engine produced from 1993 to 1996.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

9 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin, model available from 1999 to 2004.
It has 1.8 GDI 120HP petrol engine produced from 1999 to 2000.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4
Ford

14 reasons for Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

124 > 120 hp
The horsepower of the Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4 is by 4 horsepowers grater in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin. While the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance largely.
38

Trunk capacity

333 > 163 l
The trunk of the Ford is 104 percent larger in comparison to the Mitsubishi. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Maverick I will be a way more practical. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can carry.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,650 > 800 l
22

Width

1,731 > 1,695 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ford Maverick I is 2 percent wider than the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

71 > 52 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Ford Maverick I which is able to hold by 37 % more petrol in comparison to the Mitsubishi.
15

Wheelbase

2,648 > 2,451 mm
Ford Maverick I has 197 mm longer wheelbase than the Mitsubishi. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
8

Engine capacity

2,390 > 1,833 cc
The Ford Maverick I has 557 cubic centimeters greater engine displacement than the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin. The difference is big. For this reason the Ford should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand larger engine size usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
8

Maximum load capacity

680 > 480 kg
6

Length

4,590 > 4,035 mm
The Ford is 555 mm longer in relation to the Mitsubishi. Long cars have roomy cabin and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4 seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4 may be more appropriate to women as it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,805 > 1,700 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4, which is by 105 millimeters higher than the Mitsubishi, would be better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,200 > 5,250 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,404 > 1,690 kg
0

Front track

1,452 > 1,433 mm
0

Curb weight

1,717 > 1,211 kg

Mitsubishi

9 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.2 > 14 s
The Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin speeds up to 100k\h by 3.8 s better in relation to the Ford. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Top speed

168 > 160 km/h
The top velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Mitsubishi is greater compared with of the Ford Maverick I by 5, which allows the Mitsubishi to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 5 % is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
4

Rear track

1,445 > 1,430 mm
1

Model release date

1999 > 1993
Production of the older vehicle began much more earlier than its contender and for this reason it is reasonable to suppose that this vehicle has not so modern technologies applied.
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 3
0

End of model sale

2004 > 2000
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 80 %

Cars specifications

Ford Maverick I 2.4 12V 124HP manual 4x4 Mitsubishi Pajero Pinin 1.8 GDI 120HP manual 4x4
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1993 1999
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,404 kg 1,690 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK