The Nissan Terrano II uses 3 % less in the mixed cycle in relation to the Ford Maverick I. The difference in the amount of 3 % is not very appreciable. However within some time it would give a real savings.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Ford Maverick I speeds up relatively slower than the Nissan Terrano II. The
difference in the amount of
0.8 s is
not really significant and it should
not be strongly taken by you into
consideration when choosing
one of presented
Width of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability during driving. The Nissan Terrano II is widther by 24 millimeters than the Ford Maverick I and is not really relevant. The average for the „large 4x4 ” segment is 1,866 millimeters and is by 111 mm bigger than the same feature of the Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual.
The Nissan has 2 millimeters longer wheelbase in relation to Ford Maverick I. Thanks to this the Nissan is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Nissan Terrano II 2.4 i 12V 4WD 124HP manual is 103 mm longer when compared to the Ford Maverick I. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Nissan Terrano II seems to be better for families or persons who appreciate comfortable driving, the Ford Maverick I may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars at the level of 3 percent in favor of the Nissan Terrano II is little and does not matter much.