Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

24 reasons for

Lincoln Aviator, model available from 2003 to 2006.
It has 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP petrol engine produced from 2003 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Lincoln

24 reasons for Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306KM manual in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

306 > 124 hp
The Ford Maverick II significantly gives way to the Lincoln in the field of amount of horses under the hood having them by 182 hp less. Therefore the engine of the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual, as opposed to the Ford Maverick II, provides lots of power and rapid acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10 > 13.5 s
If a fast driving is what you are really in to, the Lincoln Aviator fits you better as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 26 % faster in comparison to the Ford.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,187 > 1,941 l
33

Top speed

180 > 166 km/h
The top speed of the Lincoln Aviator is greater as compared to this of the Ford Maverick II which allows to drive the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 8 percent is not big and is imperceptible in everyday use.
22

Width

1,882 > 1,781 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual is 101 millimeters wider when compared to the Ford. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

84 > 57 l
The winner of this comparison in the category of fuel tank capacity is Lincoln which is able to carry by 27 liters more fuel in relation to the Ford Maverick II.
15

Wheelbase

2,895 > 2,619 mm
Lincoln has 11 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. However, vehicles with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
12

Urban range

470 > 443 km
8

Engine capacity

4,601 > 1,990 cc
The engine size of the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 2,611 cubic centimeters when compared to the Ford Maverick II, that it is hard to take the decision which one is worth buying. These cars are so different that on the ground of information concerning engine displacement we can only choose between engine’s performance and car’s economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

500 > 470 kg
6

Length

4,909 > 4,394 mm
The Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual is 515 mm longer than the Ford Maverick II. The length of the car plays a role in terms of driving comfort and room in the boot. The Lincoln Aviator preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Lincoln Aviator will be better driven but the Ford Maverick II will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,554 > 1,530 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a better version of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which in our opinion} is with more adventages. Engine of V configuration installed in a the Lincoln gives more torque at lower RPM ranges because of the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Smooth engine work and nicer sound is to a V engine’s advantage.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2003 > 2000
Because of the fact that the Ford Maverick II's production began only 3 years earlier than the Lincoln, the distance in technology applied in both vehicles shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual might have a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,812 > 1,722 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large size, the Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual, which is by 90 millimeters higher than the Ford, would be better pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Number of seats

7 > 5
0

Payload

2,742 > 1,936 kg
0

Valves

32 > 16
0

Tire diameter

17 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

2,239 > 1,469 kg

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 18.1 l
The Ford Maverick II burns 4.8 l less fuel in city traffic in relation to the Lincoln Aviator. The difference at the level of 27 percent will be very significant in use of vehicle. Additionally, during years it will give gigantic cost savings. Also note that presented results of the average fuel efficiency may be considerably lifted if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 349 l
The boot of the Ford is 182 percent bigger than the Lincoln. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Ford Maverick II will be a way more handy. The larger the boot, the more baggage you can take with you on a journey.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,300 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Front track

1,552 > 1,547 mm
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006

Cars specifications

Lincoln Aviator 4.6 i V8 32V 306HP manual Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2003 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,742 kg 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK