Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

25 reasons for

Lincoln Navigator II, model available from 2002 to 2006.
It has 5.4 i V8 304HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2006.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Lincoln

25 reasons for Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304KM manual in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

304 > 124 hp
The Ford significantly loses with the Lincoln Navigator II in the category of horsepower having them by 145 percent less. Consequently the engine of the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual ,unlike the Ford Maverick II, provides lots of power and impersive acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

9.3 > 13.5 s
The Lincoln Navigator II speeds up to 100k\h by 31 percent faster than the Ford. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Lincoln will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,965 > 1,941 l
33

Top speed

170 > 166 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Lincoln is higher in comparison to this of the Ford which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 4 kilometers/hour is not big and is imperceptible in daily driving.
22

Width

2,037 > 1,781 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Lincoln Navigator II is 256 mm wider in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

105 > 57 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Lincoln Navigator II that can hold 84 percent more fuel in relation to the Ford Maverick II. The average fuel tank size in the large SUV segment, which is represented by the Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual, amounts to 84 liters, whereas in large SUV class (represented by the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual) it equals 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

3,025 > 2,619 mm
Lincoln has 16 percent longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
12

Urban range

541 > 443 km
8

Engine capacity

5,398 > 1,990 cc
The Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual has 171 percent bigger engine displacement in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. Such a considerable difference makes that comparision of this characteristics is hard. The Ford Maverick II would be the good choice for drivers who apreciate lower fuel consumption and vehicle owning costs at the expense of slower driving, however, owners the Lincoln should take adventage of better power, durability, culture of the engine and consequently more fun from driving.
8

Maximum load capacity

605 > 470 kg
6

Length

5,228 > 4,394 mm
The Lincoln is 834 mm longer when compared to the Ford Maverick II. Long cars more of passenger space and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Lincoln Navigator II occurs to be better choice for families or those who love the idea of convenient driving, the Ford Maverick II may be more appropriate to women as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
4

Rear track

1,704 > 1,530 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a improved construction of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which according to us is with more adventages. Engine of V configuration put inside a the Lincoln Navigator II gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain high numbers of cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and pleasant sound is undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2002 > 2000
Because of the fact that the Ford Maverick II's production started only 2 years before the Lincoln Navigator II, the distance in technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Lincoln might feature a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,975 > 1,722 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars of 253 mm in favor of the Lincoln is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

255 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Number of seats

8 > 5
0

Payload

3,305 > 1,936 kg
0

Front track

1,701 > 1,552 mm
0

Valves

32 > 16
0

Tire diameter

18 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

2,701 > 1,469 kg

Ford

3 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 19.6 l
The Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual burns up 6.3 l less fuel in city traffic than the Lincoln Navigator II. The difference at the level of 32 % is quite big in everyday using car. Additionally, during several years it will give real and noticeable cost savings. Also note that presented results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably increased if you move swiftly. The difference in fuel consumption of the vehicles selected by you is so colossal that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 507 l
The trunk of the Ford is 94 % more spacious compared to the Lincoln. It is sensible difference therefore in this category the Ford Maverick II will be a way more useful. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take.
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006

Cars specifications

Lincoln Navigator II 5.4 i V8 304HP manual Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2002 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 3,305 kg 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK