Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124HP manual vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Mazda Tribute I, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124KM manual in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.2 > 9.8 l
The Mazda Tribute I burns up 6 percent less in the combined cycle than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The difference in the amount of 6 percent is not very appreciable. At the same time during a longer period of time it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

12.7 > 13.3 l
The Mazda Tribute I burns up 5 percent less in the urban cycle in comparison to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The difference in the amount of 5 % is not realy noticeable in everyday use of the car at the same time during the term of a several months it would give a substantial cost reduction.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

13 > 13.5 s
A little difference in the amount of 4 percent suggests that the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual is insensibly beaten here. In the „large 4x4 ” segment, to which the Ford Maverick II is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.5 s and is by 28 % faster than acceleration of Ford’s car.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,247 > 1,941 l
33

Top speed

169 > 166 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124HP manual is greater than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual by 3 kilometers per hour, which allows the Mazda Tribute I to overcome quicker large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 3 kilometers per hour is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,795 > 1,781 mm
distance between left and right side of a car directly influences on room in the cabin as well as stability during driving. The Mazda Tribute I is widther only by 1 percent than the Ford Maverick II and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „large off-road 4x4” segment equals to around 1,866 millimeters and is by 71 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Mazda.
19

Range

606 > 592 km
15

Wheelbase

2,622 > 2,619 mm
The Mazda Tribute I has 3 mm longer wheelbase than Ford Maverick II. Thanks to this the Mazda Tribute I is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Maximum load capacity

490 > 470 kg
6

Length

4,395 > 4,394 mm
The Mazda Tribute I is 1 mm longer in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually provide more storage space. While the Mazda Tribute I occurs to be better for families or drivers who appreciate convenient rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Ford Maverick II may be more appropriate to the young because it will not cause problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,550 > 1,530 mm
0

Front track

1,553 > 1,552 mm
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″

Ford

7 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 368 l
The trunk of the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual is 617 l more spacious compared to the Mazda Tribute I. It is perceptible difference therefore in this category the Ford will be much more practical. The larger the trunk, the more luggage you can load.
12

Urban range

443 > 442 km
8

Engine capacity

1,990 > 1,989 cc
The Ford has by 1 cc greater engine size when compared to the Mazda Tribute I. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
1

Height

1,722 > 1,710 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 1 % in favor of the Ford is insignificant and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

225 > 215 mm
0

Payload

1,936 > 1,916 kg
0

Curb weight

1,469 > 1,420 kg

Cars specifications

Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 2WD 124HP manual Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 1,916 kg 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK