The Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 burns up 3 % fewer in the mixed cycle in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not perceptible. Nevertheless within some time it can generate a considerable reduction of costs.
The fuel consumption of the Mazda Tribute I is 5 percent lower than the Ford Maverick II. Despite the fact that the difference is insensible, in the long run it can make that your car would be much cheper to utilize.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Mazda Tribute I is 14 mm wider when compared to the Ford Maverick II. It is clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 has 3 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
Maximum load capacity
The Mazda Tribute I is 1 millimeter longer when compared to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Mazda very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Mazda Tribute I 2.0 i 16V 4WD 124HP manual 4x4 will be better driven ,however, the Ford Maverick II will be a bit easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.