Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

7 reasons for

Mercury Mariner I, model available from 2005 to 2007.
It has 2.3 155HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2007.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Mercury

7 reasons for Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155KM in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

155 > 124 hp
The horsepower of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is by 25 % bigger when compared to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Because the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance extensively.
22

Width

1,790 > 1,781 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is 9 millimeters wider than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

62 > 57 l
The Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual is worst that the Mercury in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is able to carry by 5 liters more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,627 > 2,619 mm
Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP has 8 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,428 > 4,394 mm
The Mercury is 34 mm longer in comparison to the Ford. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Mercury Mariner I preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Mercury Mariner I will be better driven ,however, the Ford Maverick II will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2005 > 2000
The difference in release date between compared vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mercury Mariner I may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,730 > 1,722 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference that amounts to 8 millimeters in favor of the Mercury is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.

Ford

1 reason for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 829 l
With more trunk space the Ford Maverick II will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional vehicle compared with the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP. If the size of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Ford Maverick II will be better to buy as it is about 156 liters larger than the trunk of its rival.

Cars specifications

Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK