The horsepower of the Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is by 25 % bigger when compared to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Because the difference is small this should not affect the vehicles performance extensively.
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as stability of driving. The Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is 9 millimeters wider than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
The Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual is worst that the Mercury in the category of fuel tank capacity. The Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP is able to carry by 5 liters more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
Mercury Mariner I 2.3 155HP has 8 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
The Mercury is 34 mm longer in comparison to the Ford. The length of the vehicle plays a role in respect of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Mercury Mariner I preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Mercury Mariner I will be better driven ,however, the Ford Maverick II will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
Model release date
The difference in release date between compared vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mercury Mariner I may have more advanced solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference that amounts to 8 millimeters in favor of the Mercury is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.