Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205HP vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205HP

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Mercury Mountaineer II, model available from 2002 to 2005.
It has 4.0 205HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2005.
Drive has manual gearbox.

1 reason for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Mercury

8 reasons for Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205KM in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

205 > 124 hp
The Mercury Mountaineer II comes with petrol which makes by 65 % more horsepower than the Ford Maverick II, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It seems to be googd option for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
22

Width

1,840 > 1,781 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Mercury Mountaineer II is 59 mm wider when compared to the Ford. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

85 > 57 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Mercury that can contain 49 % more fuel in comparison to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The medium fuel tank size in the large SUV segment, which is represented by the Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205HP, equals 84 l, whereas in large 4x4 class (represented by the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual) it is 84 liters.
15

Wheelbase

2,904 > 2,619 mm
The Mercury has 11 % longer wheelbase in comparison to Ford Maverick II. Thanks to this the Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205HP is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
6

Length

4,850 > 4,394 mm
The Mercury Mountaineer II is 10 % longer in relation to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of driving comfort and space in the boot. The Mercury Mountaineer II very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Mercury Mountaineer II will be better driven but the Ford Maverick II will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2002 > 2000
The difference in release date between compared vehicles is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Mercury Mountaineer II may have more advanced technologieswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,818 > 1,722 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Mercury Mountaineer II, which is by 96 mm higher than the Ford Maverick II, would be better pick for you. However, compared cars do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5

Ford

1 reason for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205HP

Reasons for
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2005

Cars specifications

Mercury Mountaineer II 4.0 205HP Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2002 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK