The Mitsubishi Pajero III comes with petrol which delivers by 43 % more horsepower over the Ford Maverick II, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be better car for drivers who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP that can carry 13 l more fuel compared with the Ford Maverick II. The average fuel tank capacity in the full-size SUV segment, which is represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP, amounts to 84 l, whereas in large off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Ford Maverick II) it amounts to 84 l.
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi has 108 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Ford. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
The Mitsubishi is 5 percent longer in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually have more storage space. Although the Mitsubishi occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Ford Maverick II may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 15 millimeters in favor of the Mitsubishi Pajero III is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.