Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual vs Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released

7 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero III, model available from 2000 to 2006.
It has 3.0 V6 177HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2006.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP
Ford

7 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 415 l
The trunk of the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual is 137 percent more spacious compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero III. It is sensible difference so, in this category the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual will be a way more functional. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can take with you on a journey.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,941 > 1,255 l
22

Width

1,781 > 1,778 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability while driving. The width of the Ford Maverick II is larger by 3 mm in relation to the Mitsubishi and is not really relevant. The medium for the „full-size SUV” class amounts to around 1,866 mm and is by 85 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Ford.
4

Rear track

1,530 > 1,480 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
There’s no doubts that the five-door Ford Maverick II is more convenient and if you regularly drive with more than one people then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The biggest advantage of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded down. However, three-door cars like the Mitsubishi Pajero III very often look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Mitsubishi Pajero III may be a good one.
0

Front track

1,552 > 1,464 mm
0

End of model sale

2007 > 2006

Mitsubishi

5 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177KM in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

177 > 124 hp
The Mitsubishi Pajero III comes with petrol which delivers by 43 % more horsepower over the Ford Maverick II, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be better car for drivers who would like to experience thrill of drive a sports car.
19

Fuel tank

70 > 57 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP that can carry 13 l more fuel compared with the Ford Maverick II. The average fuel tank capacity in the full-size SUV segment, which is represented by the Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP, amounts to 84 l, whereas in large off-road 4x4 class (represented by the Ford Maverick II) it amounts to 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,727 > 2,619 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate car's weight distribution. Mitsubishi has 108 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to Ford. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
6

Length

4,613 > 4,394 mm
The Mitsubishi is 5 percent longer in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. Long vehicles more of passenger space and usually have more storage space. Although the Mitsubishi occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who value comfortable driving, the Ford Maverick II may be more appropriate to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Height

1,737 > 1,722 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of boarding it and greater possibility of putting massive amount of stuff to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 15 millimeters in favor of the Mitsubishi Pajero III is insignificant and should not be really noticeable.

Cars specifications

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual Mitsubishi Pajero III 3.0 V6 177HP
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2000 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 1,936 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK