Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I, model available from 1996 to 2008.
It has 3.0 V6 170HP ic petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has automatic, 4 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Mitsubishi

17 reasons for Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

170 > 124 hp
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 has by 46 hp more horsepower in relation to Ford. The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I will be distinctly quicker speed up because of bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also getting ahead of other cars while driving should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

253 > 175 Nm
Due to 45 % more torque, the engine of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Ford Maverick II. This, in turn, have a positive impact on acceleration.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

12.8 > 13.5 s
A little difference at the level of 0.7 s suggests that the Ford is the worst car of these two compared. In the „large off-road 4x4 class, being represented by the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual, the medium acceleration to 100km/h is 10.5 s and is by 3 s higher than this of Ford car.
33

Top speed

175 > 166 km/h
The top velocity of the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 is higher in comparison to this of the Ford which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 5 % is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

4,495 > 4,500 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the highest torque is delivered tells us how fast an engine reaches its full performance with increase in rotational speed. The lower revolutions or the longer range in which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt faster.
15

Wheelbase

2,725 > 2,619 mm
Mitsubishi has 4 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also gives more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

6 > 4
8

Engine capacity

2,971 > 1,990 cc
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I has 981 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in relation to the Ford. The difference is considerable. As a result the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand bigger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,610 > 4,394 mm
The Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I is 5 percent longer in relation to the Ford. Long cars are more spacious and also provide more storage space. Although the Mitsubishi seems to be better pick for families or drivers who value comfortable rides, the Ford may appeal to singles as it will not make troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
An engine in the shape of a V is a upgraded construction of a engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line which according to us is with more adventages. Engine of V characteristic put in a car the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of engime may house more cylinders in a smaller package. A Better engine work and thrilling sound is certainly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
To those who opt for more functional driving a car and who don’t want complications that stems from the manual transmission we recommend vehicles equipped with automatic transmission. For those who have a flair for sport driving a manual gearbox might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,000 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

2008 > 2007
0

Valves

24 > 16
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

1,835 > 1,469 kg

Ford

8 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.8 > 13.5 l
The Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual burns up 3.7 l fewer amount of fuel in the combined cycle in comparison to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. The difference in the amount of 27 percent will be quite significant in everyday usage of the car. In the long period of time it will bring you a real savings.
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 17.5 l
The Ford Maverick II uses 24 percent of fuel fewer running around the town than the Mitsubishi. The Ford, which represents large off-road 4x4 class, uses 1.5 l fewer petrol, which constitutes by 10 percent better fuel consumption than the average in the same segment. The difference in fuel efficiency between compared vehicles is really significant, so remember that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should choose vehicles with similar characteristics.
22

Width

1,781 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Ford is 86 millimeters wider than the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
10

Number of gears

5 > 4 gears
The Ford Maverick II has a one more speed compared to the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I. Usually this additional gear is a taller one thanks to which the previous speeds can be narrower in order to allow better acceleration in the lower speeds. One more gear as well have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 emission.
4

Rear track

1,530 > 1,434 mm
1

Model release date

2000 > 1996
Given that the Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I was unveiled only 4 years prior to the Ford Maverick II, the gap between technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Ford Maverick II might feature a bit more advanced solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,722 > 1,720 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars of 2 mm to the advantage of the Ford Maverick II is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Front track

1,552 > 1,422 mm

Cars specifications

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport I 3.0 V6 170HP automatic 4x4 Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1996 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload - 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK