The Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual has by 89 % more horsepower compared to Ford Maverick II. The Nissan Murano I will be distinctly quicker speed up because of bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for the Nissan Murano I equipped with stronger engine.
The Nissan Murano I burns 11 % less fuel in the city than the Ford. The difference at the level of 11 % will be very big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, within several years it will bring real and noticeable cost savings. Also you shoule take int consideration that medium results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a swift driving is what you realy like, the Nissan is better for you because it’s
acceleration to 100 km/h is
better compared to
the Ford Maverick II.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Nissan Murano I is 6 % wider when compared to the Ford Maverick II. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
The Ford gives way to the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Nissan Murano I is able to store by 24 l more fuel in comparison to its rival.
Nissan Murano I has 8 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
The Nissan Murano I has 1,509 cc greater engine capacity than the Ford Maverick II. The difference is relatively considerable. Consequently the Nissan Murano I should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger cubic capacity results in worst fuel efficiency.
Maximum load capacity
The Nissan is 376 millimeters longer when compared to the Ford. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Nissan probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Nissan will be better driven but the Ford Maverick II will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.
A Vee engine is a
improved construction of a
engine with all cylinders aligned in one row
which in our opinion} is
a better choice. Engine of V layout
installed in a the Nissan Murano I
gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to
the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of
motor can contain more
cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A
Better engine work and thrilling sound is
to driving fans to a Vee
Model release date
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Nissan Murano I may feature more modern technologies.