Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Stahlkocher Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released

22 reasons for

Nissan Murano I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker All Rights Released

22 reasons for Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234KM manual in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for

135

Maximal power

234 > 124 hp

The Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual has by 89 % more horsepower compared to Ford Maverick II. The Nissan Murano I will be distinctly quicker speed up because of bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also leaving behind obstacles like TIRs or buses while driving should be much more easier for the Nissan Murano I equipped with stronger engine.

Add a comment

Urban consumption

11.8 > 13.3 l

The Nissan Murano I burns 11 % less fuel in the city than the Ford. The difference at the level of 11 % will be very big in everyday using vehicle. Additionally, within several years it will bring real and noticeable cost savings. Also you shoule take int consideration that medium results of the average fuel efficiency can be considerably lifted if you drive swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the cars compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose vehicles with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision have a sense.

Add a comment

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.9 > 13.5 s

If a swift driving is what you realy like, the Nissan is better for you because it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 5.6 s better compared to the Ford Maverick II.

Add a comment

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,006 > 1,941 l

Add a comment

Width

1,880 > 1,781 mm

The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Nissan Murano I is 6 % wider when compared to the Ford Maverick II. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.

Add a comment

Fuel tank

81 > 57 l

The Ford gives way to the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Nissan Murano I is able to store by 24 l more fuel in comparison to its rival.

Add a comment

Wheelbase

2,822 > 2,619 mm

Nissan Murano I has 8 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Maverick II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.

Add a comment

Cylinders

6 > 4

Add a comment

Urban range

695 > 443 km

Add a comment

Engine capacity

3,499 > 1,990 cc

The Nissan Murano I has 1,509 cc greater engine capacity than the Ford Maverick II. The difference is relatively considerable. Consequently the Nissan Murano I should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger cubic capacity results in worst fuel efficiency.

Add a comment

Maximum load capacity

616 > 470 kg

Add a comment

Length

4,770 > 4,394 mm

The Nissan is 376 millimeters longer when compared to the Ford. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Nissan probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Nissan will be better driven but the Ford Maverick II will be a bit easier to park due to shorter length of the body.

Add a comment

Rear track

1,619 > 1,530 mm

Add a comment

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline

A Vee engine is a improved construction of a engine with all cylinders aligned in one row which in our opinion} is a better choice. Engine of V layout installed in a the Nissan Murano I gives more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and thrilling sound is to driving fans to a Vee engine’s advantage.

Add a comment

Model release date

2002 > 2000

The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Nissan Murano I may feature more modern technologies.

Add a comment

Tire width

235 > 225 mm

Add a comment

Payload

2,205 > 1,936 kg

Add a comment

Front track

1,620 > 1,552 mm

Add a comment

Valves

24 > 16

Add a comment

Tire diameter

18 > 15 ″

Add a comment

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Add a comment

Curb weight

1,588 > 1,469 kg

Add a comment

Reasons for

Trunk capacity

985 > 923 l

If you need a car for long trips, which could room more luggage , decide to buy the Ford Maverick II. The Nissan Murano I has by 62 l less capable trunk in comparison to the Nissan Murano I 3.5 i V6 24V 234HP manual so in this case you would be able to carry one small parcel less. Assessing the luggage compartment also pay attention to its width length and height which have considerable impact on loading capability .

Add a comment

Height

1,722 > 1,692 mm

The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference at the level of 30 millimeters in favor of the Ford is not big and does not matter much.

Add a comment