Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported

18 reasons for

Ssangyong Rexton I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 2.3 RX 140HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2007.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Ssangyong

18 reasons for Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140KM manual in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

140 > 124 hp
The horsepower of the Ssangyong is 16 hp grater than the Ford Maverick II. While the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance largely.
33

Top speed

170 > 166 km/h
The maximum speed of the Ssangyong Rexton I is higher as compared to this of the Ford which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference at the level of 4 km/h is small and is imperceptible in daily driving.
22

Width

1,880 > 1,781 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Ssangyong is 99 mm wider than the Ford Maverick II. It is clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

684 > 592 km
19

Fuel tank

80 > 57 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Ssangyong which can comprise 23 liters more fuel in comparison to the Ford Maverick II. The average fuel container capacity in the large off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the Ssangyong, equals 84 liters, whereas in large 4x4 segment (represented by the Ford Maverick II) it amounts to 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,838 > 2,619 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Ssangyong Rexton I has 8 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Ford Maverick II. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the stability and steering. Thus, the mass of Ssangyong Rexton I should be better distributed and driving should be easier and safer.
12

Urban range

506 > 443 km
8

Engine capacity

2,294 > 1,990 cc
The Ssangyong has by 15 % greater engine capacity when compared to the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. This may have a little impact when it comes to car's performance, as both values does not differ much.
8

Maximum load capacity

735 > 470 kg
6

Length

4,729 > 4,394 mm
The Ssangyong Rexton I is 335 mm longer when compared to the Ford. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Ssangyong Rexton I will be better driven ,however, the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,540 > 1,530 mm
1

Model release date

2002 > 2000
Because of the fact that the Ford's production started only 2 years earlier than the Ssangyong Rexton I, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really big, however, the Ssangyong may feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,770 > 1,722 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of loading massive amount of thinks to it. The difference that amounts to 48 millimeters to the advantage of the Ssangyong Rexton I is little and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

235 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,550 > 1,936 kg
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

1,816 > 1,469 kg

Ford

5 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

9.8 > 11.9 l
The Ford consumes 18 percent less fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. The Ford Maverick II, which is classified in „large SUV” segment consumes by 2.4 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 12.2 l.
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 15.8 l
The Ford burns up of 2.5 l petrol less while driving inside city in relation to the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. The Ford Maverick II, as a representative of large 4x4 class, uses of 1.5 l per 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “large off-road 4x4” segment is 14.8 l/100Km.
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 501 l
The trunk of the Ford Maverick II is 97 % larger than the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Ford will be a way more functional. The larger the boot, the more luggage you can hold.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,941 > 1,921 l
0

Front track

1,552 > 1,550 mm

Cars specifications

Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2002 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,550 kg 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK