Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual vs Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

21 reasons for

Toyota Sequoia I, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 4.7 V8 32V 243HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

3 reasons for

Ford Maverick II, model available from 2000 to 2007.
It has 2.0 i 16V 124HP petrol engine produced from 2000 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
Toyota

21 reasons for Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243KM manual in comparison to Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

243 > 124 hp
The Toyota Sequoia I has 119 hp more horsepower in comparison to Ford. The Toyota Sequoia I will be distinctly quicker accelerate owing to grater power. Also leaving behind other cars while moving along the road should be a piece of cake for a car equipped with more powerful motor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,301 > 1,941 l
33

Top speed

175 > 166 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Toyota Sequoia I is greater compared with of the Ford Maverick II by 9 kilometers per hour, which allows the Toyota Sequoia I to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 9 km/h is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
22

Width

2,032 > 1,781 mm
Width of a vehicle influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Toyota is larger by 251 millimeters in comparison to the Ford and is not really worth considering. The average for the „full-size SUV” class is 1,866 mm and is by 166 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Toyota.
19

Fuel tank

100 > 57 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank size is Toyota Sequoia I which is able to take by 43 l more petrol in relation to the Ford.
15

Wheelbase

3,102 > 2,619 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to more appropriate vehicle's weight distribution. Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual has 18 percent longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Ford Maverick II. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Toyota Sequoia I should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 1,990 cc
The engine displacement of the Ford Maverick II is so much lower ( the difference amounts to 2,674 cubic centimeters in relation to the Ford Maverick II, that it is aimless to take the decision which car should you choose. These cars are so dissimilar that on the ground of information concerning engine size we can only choose between car’s performance and vehicle’s economy.
8

Maximum load capacity

650 > 470 kg
6

Length

5,209 > 4,394 mm
The Toyota Sequoia I is 815 mm longer than the Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual. Long cars have more interior space and usually provide bigger trunk. Although the Toyota Sequoia I occurs to be better pick for families or drivers who love the idea of comfortable rides, the Ford may appeal to singles because it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,752 > 1,530 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A Vee engine is a better construction of a straight engine which as far as we are concerned is wiser to choose one. Engine of V type inside a the Toyota Sequoia I produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain high numbers of cylinders without significant growth in its size. A Better engine work and nicer sound is to driving fans undoubtedly to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Model release date

2001 > 2000
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a blistering pace and for that reason the Toyota Sequoia I may have more modern technologies thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,956 > 1,722 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading massive amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 14 % in favor of the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is not big and does not matter much.
1

Tire width

245 > 225 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,300 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,945 > 1,936 kg
0

Front track

1,726 > 1,552 mm
0

Valves

32 > 16
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Curb weight

2,298 > 1,469 kg

Ford

3 reasons for Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124KM manual in comparison to Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

13.3 > 23 l
The Ford uses of 9.7 l gasoline less while driving inside city in comparison to the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual. The Ford Maverick II, as a representative of large off-road 4x4 class, consumes 1.5 l of fuel for every 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “large SUV” class is 14.8 l of fuel for every 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

985 > 785 l
The Ford Maverick II has 200 l bigger luggage compartment in comparison to the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual. Such a difference is quite relevant so it will matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Ford has 30 percent bigger trunk capacity than the average in the same class. Larger luggage compartment will be useful during family traveling and also during everyday car’s usage.
12

Urban range

443 > 430 km

Cars specifications

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual Ford Maverick II 2.0 i 16V 124HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2001 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,945 kg 1,936 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK