The horsepower is a parameter that most of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Renault Laguna I Hatchback which has by 13 percent horsepower more than the Ford, which makes this vehicle a bit faster. Because of more horsepower the Renault Laguna I Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual should also provide slightly more efficiency in specific gears.
The Renault consumes 0.4 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle than the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback. The Renault Laguna I Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual, which is classified in „large family cars” class consumes by 0.3 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 7.7 l.
The Renault Laguna I Hatchback has 4 % more torque in relation to the Ford. Although most of people do not take into account the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it presents the best how a car is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is insensible so it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
The fuel consumption of the Renault is 1.2 l better than the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual. Despite the difference is insensible, in the long term it can cause that the vehicle would be significantly cheper to run.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Ford Mondeo II Hatchback speeds up relatively slower compared to the Renault. The
difference in the amount of
9 % is
not really significant and it should
not be vitally taken into
as important for choosing
one of presented
The boot of the Renault Laguna I Hatchback is only 3 liters bigger than the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual. However, the difference is not significant and it would be fair to say that both vehicles have more of less the same boot size.
The top velocity possible to be reached by the Renault is greater in comparison to this of the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback 1.6 16V 95HP manual by 5, which allows the Renault to cover faster large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 10 kilometers per hour is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Width of a car influences on room in the cabin and also stability on road. The width of the Renault Laguna I Hatchback is larger only by 4 mm in comparison to the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „middle” class equals to around 1,764 mm and is by 1 % bigger than the same feature of the Renault Laguna I Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual.
The Ford Mondeo II Hatchback is worst that the Renault in the category of fuel tank size. The Renault Laguna I Hatchback is able to take by 7 l more fuel than its rival.
The Renault Laguna I Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual is 30 millimeters longer than the Ford Mondeo II Hatchback. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the boot. The Renault Laguna I probably will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. At the same time the Renault Laguna I Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual will be better driven but the Ford Mondeo II will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Renault Laguna I Hatchback, which is by 11 millimeters higher than the Ford, is better choice for you. However, compared cars do not vary much in its height and it should not be much perceptible.