Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual vs Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual

Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Matthias93 All Rights Released into the public domain

16 reasons for

Ford Mondeo III Hatchback, model available from 1999 to 2007.
It has 1.8 16V 110HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Renault Laguna II Hatchback, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 1.6 i 16V 107HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2007.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual
Ford

16 reasons for Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110KM manual in comparison to Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

110 > 107 hp
The horsepower is a characteristic that most of car fans pay the greatest attention to. In this comparison, it is the Ford Mondeo III that has by 3 percent horsepower more in relation to the Renault Laguna II Hatchback, which makes this vehicle somewhat faster. Having more horsepower the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback will as well provide somewhat more efficiency in specific speeds.
59

Maximal torque

165 > 148 Nm
Maximum torque of the Ford Mondeo III is 17 Nm greater than the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual. As a result, the Ford will accelerate a little bit faster and be better to overtake other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual will burn up fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
38

Trunk capacity

500 > 430 l
The trunk of the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual is only 70 l bigger than the Renault Laguna II Hatchback. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk space.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,369 > 1,329 l
24

Extra-urban consumption

5.6 > 5.7 l
22

Width

1,813 > 1,768 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly influences on room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual is widther by 45 mm in comparison to the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual and is not really relevant. The average for the „mid-size” segment is 1,764 millimeters and is by 49 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Ford.
15

Wheelbase

2,754 > 2,746 mm
The Ford has 8 mm longer wheelbase than Renault. Therefore the Ford Mondeo III is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
8

Engine capacity

1,799 > 1,599 cc
The Ford has 200 cubic centimeters bigger engine size in comparison to the Renault. Because the difference is little, the Ford Mondeo III should accelerate only a bit faster, assuming that other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,731 > 4,576 mm
The Ford is 3 % longer in comparison to the Renault. The length of the vehicle plays a role in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Ford Mondeo III probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Ford will be better driven ,however, the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,540 > 1,481 mm
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,500 > 5,750 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

1,860 > 1,836 kg
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

1,387 > 1,284 kg

Renault

12 reasons for Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107KM manual in comparison to Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

7.4 > 7.6 l
The Renault consumes 0.2 l less fuel in the mixed cycle than the Ford Mondeo III. The Renault Laguna II Hatchback, which is classified in „D” segment burns up by 0.3 l less amount of fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 7.7 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.9 > 11.2 l
The Renault uses of 1.3 l gasoline fewer in the urban cycle in relation to the Ford. The Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual, as a representative of D class, consumes 0.7 l/100Km less than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “large family cars” segment is 10.6 l per 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.5 > 11.7 s
The Ford is relatively slower compared with the Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual. The difference at the level of 2 % is quite low and for that reason it should not be vitally taken by you into consideration when selecting the better one of compared vehicles.
33

Top speed

195 > 193 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Renault Laguna II Hatchback is higher as compared to this of the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 1 % is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,750 > 3,950 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the maximum torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s performance. However, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is worth to check a torque performance graph.
19

Range

972 > 776 km
19

Fuel tank

71 > 58 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Renault Laguna II Hatchback which can contain 13 l more fuel in relation to the Ford Mondeo III. The medium fuel tank capacity in the large family cars class, which is represented by the Renault Laguna II Hatchback, amounts to 63 l, whereas in large family cars class (represented by the Ford Mondeo III Hatchback) it equals 63 liters.
12

Urban range

707 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,228 > 1,054 km
8

Maximum load capacity

555 > 481 kg
1

Model release date

2001 > 1999
The difference in date of commencement of production between these two cars is only 2 years, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Renault Laguna II Hatchback may feature more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
0

Front track

1,525 > 1,520 mm

Cars specifications

Ford Mondeo III Hatchback 1.8 16V 110HP manual Renault Laguna II Hatchback 1.6 i 16V 107HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1999 2001
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload 1,860 kg 1,836 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK