Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual vs Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thesupermat Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Mazda 6 III Estate, model available from 2012.
It has 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP diesel engine produced from 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Ford Taurus II Estate, model available from 1991 to 1995.
It has 2.5 i 106HP petrol engine produced from 1991 to 1991.
Drive on the front axle has manual gearbox.

Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual
Mazda

13 reasons for Mazda 6 III Kombi 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175KM manual in comparison to Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

175 > 106 hp
The Mazda has by 65 % more horsepower compared to Ford Taurus II Estate. The Mazda 6 III Estate will be distinctly quicker accelerate thanks to grater horsepower. Also leaving behind other vehicles while moving along the road should be much more easier for the Mazda 6 III Estate equipped with more powerful engine.
56

Urban consumption

5.5 > 14.2 l
The Mazda 6 III Estate burns 8.7 l less fuel in urban cycle than the Ford. The difference at the level of 61 percent is quite big in daily use of vehicle. Additionally, during many months it may bring real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel consumption might be considerably increased if you move dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose vehicles with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
38

Trunk capacity

506 > 479 l
The boot of the Mazda is only 6 % bigger than the Ford Taurus II Estate. However, the difference is not big it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk capacity.
33

Top speed

221 > 165 km/h
The Ford Taurus II Estate has 34 % smaller top speed in relation to the Mazda 6 III Estate, because of which driving a long distance, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference may be noticeable during running over fast and long routes to the vehicle of Mazda brand advantage.
22

Width

1,845 > 1,801 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability on road. The Mazda is widther only by 44 millimeters than the Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the „large family cars” class amounts to approximately 1,764 mm and is by 81 millimeters larger than the same attribute of the Mazda.
19

Fuel tank

62 > 60 l
The Ford Taurus II Estate loses with the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Mazda 6 III Estate is able to store by 3 percent more fuel in comparison to its contender.
15

Wheelbase

2,752 > 2,693 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle equals the length between its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Mazda 6 III has 2 % longer wheelbase distance in comparison to Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Mazda should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
12

Urban range

1,088 > 436 km
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A five-door car usually is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and as a result the Mazda 6 III Estate, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat enlarging a luggage compartment, has an advantage over the four-door Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual which is less comfortable to load and unload baggage.
1

Height

1,475 > 1,372 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual, which is by 103 millimeters higher than the Ford Taurus II Estate, would be better option for you. However, these two cars do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
1

Model release date

2012 > 1991
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8

Ford

4 reasons for Ford Taurus II Kombi 2.5 i 106KM manual in comparison to Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual

Reasons for
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,288 > 1,649 l
8

Engine capacity

2,500 > 2,191 cc
The Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual has by 309 cubic centimeters bigger engine capacity than the Mazda 6 III Estate. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values does not vary much.
6

Length

4,877 > 4,806 mm
The Ford is 1 percent longer in comparison to the Mazda. The length of the vehicle is significant in terms of travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Ford Taurus II Estate preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual will be better driven but the Mazda 6 III Estate will be a slightly easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,400 > 4,500 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Mazda 6 III Estate 2.2 SKYACTIV-D I-ELOOP 175HP manual Ford Taurus II Estate 2.5 i 106HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2012 1991
    Facelifting no no
    Class D D
    Payload 2,090 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK