Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4 vs Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual

Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

24 reasons for

Subaru Impreza III Hatchback, model available from 2007 to 2013.
It has 1.5 i 107HP petrol engine produced from 2007 to 2013.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

6 reasons for

Ford Tempo II, model available from 1987 to 1995.
It has 2.3 102HP petrol engine produced from 1987 to 1995.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual
Subaru

24 reasons for Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

107 > 102 hp
The horsepower of the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4 is 5 hp bigger than the Ford Tempo II. While the difference is not big this should not affect the vehicles performance extensively.
112

Average consumption

7.3 > 8.7 l
The Subaru Impreza III Hatchback consumes 16 percent fewer fuel in the combined cycle when compared to the Ford Tempo II. The Subaru, being classified in „lower middle” class burns up by 0.5 l more fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
56

Urban consumption

9.6 > 10.4 l
The Subaru uses of 8 percent gasoline fewer in city traffic compared to the Ford Tempo II. The Subaru Impreza III Hatchback, as a representative of C segment, consumes 0.9 l of fuel for every 100 km more than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small family cars” class is 8.7 l per 100 km.
33

Top speed

175 > 160 km/h
The maximum velocity of the ​​Subaru Impreza III Hatchback is greater in comparison to of the Ford by 9, which allows the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4 to travel faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 15 kilometers/hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.3 > 7.3 l
22

Width

1,740 > 1,734 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Subaru is 6 millimeters wider in relation to the Ford Tempo II. It is often clearly felt by those sitting in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Range

800 > 621 km
19

Fuel tank

61 > 53 l
In this category it is the Subaru Impreza III that can contain 8 l more fuel in comparison to the Ford Tempo II. The medium fuel tank capacity in the lower middle class, which is represented by the Subaru, is 52 liters, whereas in lower middle segment (represented by the Ford Tempo II) it equals 52 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,615 > 2,527 mm
Subaru Impreza III has 88 mm longer wheelbase in relation to the Ford Tempo II. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. However, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

625 > 529 km
11

Extra-urban range

952 > 740 km
4

Rear track

1,497 > 1,463 mm
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer installed inside the Subaru is distinctly better because it is smaller and creates less vibrations than straight engine. Furthermore bear in mind that its horizontally opposed layout causes that a vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one inside the Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual, is that thanks to its simplicity of construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
3

Number of doors

5 > 4
A 5-door car generally is a hatchback (however estate cars also count as 5-door cars) and as a result the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4, which whole rear including the window lifts up and the rear seats folds flat enlarging a luggage compartment, has an advantage on the four-door Ford which in turn has smaller lid and a partition behind the rear seats.
1

Height

1,475 > 1,341 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater capacity of carrying big amount of stuff to it. The difference that amounts to 10 percent to the advantage of the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback is insignificant and does not matter much.
1

Model release date

2007 > 1987
1

Tire width

195 > 185 mm
0

Front track

1,495 > 1,396 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

End of model sale

2013 > 1995
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %
0

Curb weight

1,315 > 1,183 kg

Ford

6 reasons for Ford Tempo II 2.3 102KM manual in comparison to Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

176 > 142 Nm
The Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual has 34 newton meters more torque when compared to the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4. Even though a great deal of drivers do not take into consideration the maximum torque when buying a automobile, it shows the best how fast a car acclerates. When it comes to compared cars the difference is not really big and for that reason it probably will not make a real difference in feeling of driving a car.
38

Trunk capacity

365 > 301 l
With more trunk space the Ford Tempo II will have much more room for loading things and be more functional car compared with the Subaru Impreza III. If the size of the luggage compartment is what does appeal to you, the Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual will be better to choose because it is around 64 liters larger than the boot of its competitor.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,600 > 3,200 revolutions/minute
A wider range and a lower value of rotations at which the highest torque is produced determines an engine’s performance. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is recommended to check a torque graph.
8

Engine capacity

2,308 > 1,499 cc
The Ford Tempo II has 809 cc larger cubic capacity when compared to the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4. The difference is notable. Consequently the Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine size affects worst fuel efficiency.
6

Length

4,481 > 4,413 mm
The Ford Tempo II is 2 percent longer when compared to the Subaru Impreza III Hatchback. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Ford occurs to be better for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides, the Subaru may appeal to the young because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,400 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Subaru Impreza III Hatchback 1.5 i 107HP manual 4x4 Ford Tempo II 2.3 102HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,201 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2007 1987
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK